workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: document the format for affiliation
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 08:13:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250204081301.6fdb1536@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204154938.GF22963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:49:38 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Or apparently project or customer names for consulting companies:
> 
>      29 Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
>      34 Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>

FWIW these are customer names, indeed. Project/Foundation pays for
contracting work in both cases.

> The other cases correctly refer to companeis, for contributors using
> other email addresses:
> 
>       14 linux.dev
>       41 zytor.com
>       47 joelfernandes.org
>      176 alien8.de
>      243 gmail.com
>      333 goodmis.org
>      454 armlinux.org.uk
>      918 infradead.org
>     1007 kernel.org
> 
> Do we want to only document existing practices, or also tell which
> one(s) should be favoured ?

I'm hoping that documenting the most prevalent existing practice
will naturally make it favored. IOW I'd prefer to document just 
one option. I don't really care which one we pick, but the brackets
seem most common.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-03 17:46 Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-04  7:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-02-04 15:18   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-04 15:49     ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-02-04 16:13       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-02-04 18:05         ` Randy Dunlap
2025-02-04 19:33           ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-04 19:43             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-02-04 19:43           ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-02-05  7:37 ` Yanteng Si
2025-02-05 14:23   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 14:52     ` Yanteng Si
2025-02-05 14:57       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-06  8:21         ` Yanteng Si
2025-02-10 18:38 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-02-10 18:45   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250204081301.6fdb1536@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox