From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1311754918; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 08:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733732155; cv=none; b=rpv2VfFzdD5fjKMJdbkmYUf+DomiLhV97DzDl6AKxCOc2ZIf/DudQvto7e+PzlLP4UiWsf342tI2I1/RUA0G3RSevfm/FtNiFG269qLC9RZfg5aT2i+aLSADjVhRvvljRn5BZFWqL+1P8d+ClaW+2kLSjVeSbQS5q2m8IqWJIKo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733732155; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OcV2xYxRXTCXMuX1ekCAw7NyTEEuqu99/Vs5cwe1gBs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bIkV0e7LPdqnSyREiy0yR7tDUH4Z9JoxO5VdknOfHbvI/1DadkBMEdCoWNE0uiWsJBy4VAFqqPszv1NzaxsmdWR4FAjnWdk/L4noIHBpv7smMw9Gc4vMPRWwBoWU6pYUmB1Dx9rTBecUbf16ZG+00uov1hY5tUPe7q0ted4FEBA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Jjmr385a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Jjmr385a" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13641C4CED1; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 08:15:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733732154; bh=OcV2xYxRXTCXMuX1ekCAw7NyTEEuqu99/Vs5cwe1gBs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Jjmr385a0JB0QLKCV/1CcCyNl02f9Avzzglhdh2HISXHY4xizV709sTTiHPmzBjlE 8lKa0lPqozeC8liJOK4qXeE5HDqpENxW0BywmqYb3uVQ9wHtTonD8aIo1y/fj+7elZ wjFl4XcD97VFB8M4GcoC38L4I+VLPMLYnsB7ikDpVqnMqi4MrvhQbVC0TurwWpG4L0 eSkiC+wg23NIEzgtYC6687X2pb6HWADK7NZcLHHaM7llgO6gkpxDUU9IzIxnhKIPwR p1oidmBeylmrWGzgN6ibcqc6v4J6nw3o+FsYNdHHAxJtmB1m/rghR9DRFceHSEnraL 6B+BzFaNG3grg== Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:15:48 +0100 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Hans Verkuil , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Media committers model postponed to 6.14 - Was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Document the new media-committer's model Message-ID: <20241209091548.165e5152@foz.lan> In-Reply-To: <20241203140712.57daa65f@foz.lan> References: <20241203081958.6c186835@foz.lan> <20241203112209.GR10736@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20241203140712.57daa65f@foz.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Em Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:07:12 +0100 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > > The idea is to gradually open media-committers to more people, as each > phase succeeds, addressing infra, procedures, etc. > > My rough idea is to do: > > - Phase 0.99: beta testers; > - Phase 1 is to invite people that regularly submit PRs; > - Phase 2 is to invite other active maintainers; > - Phase 3 (or 2?, TBD) to open for non-maintainers. > > We shouldn't rush it, as there are a lot to be done before opening it > broadly. So, I would say that: > - phase 0.99 would start in -rc2 (if things go well during this week); > - phase 1 may still happen on this merge window, but as there will be > only a few weeks between -rc2 and -rc6, and people usually get > holidays in Dec/Jan, it is more likely that it will start for > 6.14-rc1, again if we didn't notice big issues on phase 0.99. > > We should wait at least for a couple of releases on phase 1, > again to cleanup process and fine-tune infra. If things go well, > we can move to phase 2. After some discussions with Hans, we decided to postpone the beta testers phase to the next kernel cycle. There are a couple of reasons for that: - This should give us more time to come up with a final version of the media-committers documentation and agreement; - This would also work better with regards to end of year's vacations, as they'll be affecting at least 2/3 -rc versions. Plus, we all have things to finish before such vacations. So, better to start fresh next year; - Media CI still had issues with a patch series I submitted, as it picked the wrong baseline, causing CI to not test two patches that were applied on the top of media-committers/next branch. This was fixed by Ricardo, but it means that we may still need to polish CI before granting more people righs there. With that, if we want to start the media committers for 6.14, we should aim to close review this document by -rc6, or, at most, -rc7, getting the patches merged during the next merge window. Regard Thanks, Mauro