From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2401B189BB1; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 06:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733209197; cv=none; b=LN2u3ejOwQNhKIuMvMosiiAtxzOxjoguXnaW9FUeDaThdOt0EfL//n0qtRip9uBQwmVzu1+MsZZBP6dNI/p8sLsZ5IYvCqPt31jQOFVZ+o7XABZUQDLTEUMS9e2RE/n1VutH9jCqHcgBOxsK37fivzPDcjHOt4xxkeL0sjhw97U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733209197; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fxLpxJ49/62muxJi+PRy6L5Q1LtrGMaZmRWd0CXi+5Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oVQ828BWWAh7yh7mSWlMZqDNQDAeIn03SHPQHkOBKaQ1gABt90aTfl58DZ312aycdxFXZW6AIDX9cRWZwpenILtmPFI2XuKRlWJ5DSCAkI0TZvzz9Qgpu+pzhlGXMSM5+QlzDdiKB/6Uinv0DFqF+hO+TsEbKaUFr8xSlay0lSg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CpUpWXlF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CpUpWXlF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7E6FC4CECF; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 06:59:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733209196; bh=fxLpxJ49/62muxJi+PRy6L5Q1LtrGMaZmRWd0CXi+5Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CpUpWXlFzjEgxgq2nKhD+oiOXshkmThD3+1a2HZ21yDtBg2zIqfMHuWCmP4Eq8/aq J7VBn/+sVgF2IUg5YyEovPGzdqj+SPGZhvUA6t56iBQMrywFbT39DfvcH2lZOI/VKB QDwdRZE5YdNAVqD2azLu7XYKEbnoc2QwhjDesESgwQz1/9rvjME93Y0NcKaRSB4NSZ mg/RpwHeMZJ64EuzTwgGt7DqS8V22C5r6ptHX3h7K3bmANKtJkEix2zAf2RFfDD6zk ccoiYhPhcSa3k6V0emWHejnjDNcTHBFh26xQ/q3nFkBWYoJOd+pDlh6DcRWcZVzf6A ZgqBtIwTvfZyQ== Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 07:59:51 +0100 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Jonathan Corbet , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , Simona Vetter , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 DONOTMERGE] docs: clarify rules wrt tagging other people Message-ID: <20241203075951.3a7021ec@foz.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20241202092857.7d197995@foz.lan> <20241202110210.5e56d69e@foz.lan> <20241202154528.7949e7cb@foz.lan> <6f1bbdf3-22df-415c-b017-de1cf81af57e@leemhuis.info> <20241202171734.2874a9a3@foz.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Em Tue, 3 Dec 2024 07:25:43 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis escreveu: > On 02.12.24 17:17, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:54:49 +0100 > > Thorsten Leemhuis escreveu: > >> On 02.12.24 15:45, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:54:56 +0100 > >>> Thorsten Leemhuis escreveu: > >>>> On 02.12.24 11:02, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>>>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:28:57 +0100 > >>>>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > >>>>>>> +Tagging people requires permission > >>>>>>> +---------------------------------- > >>>>>>> + > >>>>>>> +Be careful in the addition of tags to your patches, as all except for Cc:, > >>>>>>> +Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit permission of the person named. > >>>>> > >>>>> Hmm... There is another tag that we use without requiring explicit permissions: > >>>>> > >>>>> Requested-by: > >>>>> > >>>>> There are currently 376 occurrences on 6.13-rc1. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is used when a maintainer or reviewer publicly requests some changes to > >>>>> be added on a patch series. > >>> [...] > >>> You're basically requesting explicit permission for any "non-official" > >>> tags as well, including reviewed-by. This is not what it is wanted here. > >> > >> I could easily use a slightly modified phrase like "...as all > >> mentioned above except...". > > > > It seems a lot better to me. > > I went with this a slightly different variant for readability: > > Be careful in the addition of the aforementioned tags to your patches, > as all except for Cc:, Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit > permission of the person named. > > Hope that's okay. If I don't hear anything, I'll assume your earlier > Reviewed-by: is still valid. It is. Just in case: Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > Ciao, Thorsten Thanks, Mauro