From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95087126C13; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733156259; cv=none; b=OB8cLT4xHL1I7YFxtNKqR8vP8lyPM05FVx74tI0ylw2BF08mjJE7YoiyPkhKyCpyX+pphCtpycR8Px6fIKgiTKfweWH+P/WRwouy848+LgRuK6l6SNMjFgvtR1tifBa/COdaHmy4JKsR2qFnTufG9MxdAih63YloDmHgObO314g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733156259; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FdAl/pnmfZjlLTBXtyBGlzxjl+zb6kNwgaI64za+Yy0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DCYVAn1tRcR2Q8zMEdPCruVTCMQS2+It6YgRikBh9J381wTbpJo0z4AWd6b7Ujx2HwvPJvyDdBm5BIOLa7GHZKukaCySLQqFhZdy2dDs/7W0dROar8S9t1Uhvag8C6LZwURUeE4tzvU6lP1hjp913LR3WGh19KCAPsnxA5/STLE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=orWka/Fs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="orWka/Fs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 571A8C4CED1; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:17:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733156259; bh=FdAl/pnmfZjlLTBXtyBGlzxjl+zb6kNwgaI64za+Yy0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=orWka/FshVy1ETVnsHYOcsYvI47dzAzZfvzCVSpKLJId8S9UECUiMx/pbQiSopcVx Xpa5p/+71s/PxhdGdF4KVuO1+nR7K4xvqMYfNIAlR9Hd+RKM4rKVNhseKiqq1klPsG prq+gpR+IiXmGO2c1Ernb+PzokGx2meBGohin/PU6Jz8Vn4lDrGGj0gRq1EraAGxsc WECvenbjRbZE8P2qOwL+RJ9/Oib7wAdjcr20tvR8nxfZvDAZpbijeGRQD65dXoieeH 7rJfFaEMp3rkguwLO6TDdfm5RzHMpAYd4MXNBzsiBI0Kalg1hJz+jrd8XGXhn+ryVV H4lE2t13sCOEg== Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 17:17:34 +0100 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Jonathan Corbet , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , Simona Vetter , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 DONOTMERGE] docs: clarify rules wrt tagging other people Message-ID: <20241202171734.2874a9a3@foz.lan> In-Reply-To: <6f1bbdf3-22df-415c-b017-de1cf81af57e@leemhuis.info> References: <20241202092857.7d197995@foz.lan> <20241202110210.5e56d69e@foz.lan> <20241202154528.7949e7cb@foz.lan> <6f1bbdf3-22df-415c-b017-de1cf81af57e@leemhuis.info> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:54:49 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis escreveu: > On 02.12.24 15:45, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:54:56 +0100 > > Thorsten Leemhuis escreveu: > > > >> On 02.12.24 11:02, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:28:57 +0100 > >>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > >>> > >>>>> +Tagging people requires permission > >>>>> +---------------------------------- > >>>>> + > >>>>> +Be careful in the addition of tags to your patches, as all except for Cc:, > >>>>> +Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit permission of the person named. > >>>>> +For the three aforementioned ones implicit permission is sufficient if the > >>>>> +person contributed to the Linux kernel using that name and email address > >>>>> +according to the lore archives or the commit history -- and in case of > >>>>> +Reported-by: and Suggested-by: did the reporting or suggestion in public. > >>>>> +Note, bugzilla.kernel.org is a public place in this sense, but email addresses > >>>>> +used there are private; so do not expose them in tags, unless the person used > >>>>> +them in earlier contributions. > >>> > >>> Hmm... There is another tag that we use without requiring explicit permissions: > >>> > >>> Requested-by: > >>> > >>> There are currently 376 occurrences on 6.13-rc1. > >>> > >>> This is used when a maintainer or reviewer publicly requests some changes to > >>> be added on a patch series. > > [...] > > You're basically requesting explicit permission for any "non-official" > > tags as well, including reviewed-by. This is not what it is wanted here. > > Ahh, okay, I see the problem now. But well, I'd say "as all except" in a > text like this implicitly only refers to those the text mentions in the > first place. So I'd say it's good as it is. But if people think this is > a problem, I still think it is problematic, but with the change below: > I could easily use a slightly modified phrase like "...as all > mentioned above except...". It seems a lot better to me. Regards, Mauro