From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569AC7C6CD; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709209504; cv=none; b=bCpwLoveYA4mEfFuxCkmLGvBeKqHMLjXiUH+8/Fsyurs7H+TUAtWFLqoK+XyA7fpa3cGsO3a6EpJsvtnLJaEVcdWwFR8hoWslW3rBpAyRS7g/oQHKlc8UyneWrYQ8hITA1ZOYFWnpGI9H+re6cfzJbpTQPFcGPGHCJGhXcRyheg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709209504; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K6neWUIvFeoUW8xXFJdX5R3tPB5XjlIDUunhao1jtTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V7wWpTCUpsSNfmVU1cvmVPRLE1MAitivZtgNzwP0SSMHwyVmTaCZnKvUOl2hEUNyLdMcSPQqyPJALRpBliJMDt4kSroMqWRnOHYcM6YJJ/SdnhL8yChm0wez/n2gn68H2jKh7CWWzwpuJlTz3kSfAzNPBnWujDMFnkiYpA3K5ZY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=wcBsRyjr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="wcBsRyjr" Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (89-27-53-110.bb.dnainternet.fi [89.27.53.110]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDB93673; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:24:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1709209488; bh=K6neWUIvFeoUW8xXFJdX5R3tPB5XjlIDUunhao1jtTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wcBsRyjry5kHLIzEbjm/NFi/nTIml+y2541VxIqpb3C8yubjlwE8UsajGdDLFH389 D0Z6S/eV/nzltcCvWj9KNHyE+vYdlE3MkXlYXglPUTSKBRwzWpgOBXeLeUO/yelXKn Dg7fnds8NhKgxTm8mvtHILYR/TNTkjA8+vvwO3W8= Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:25:03 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Guillaume Tucker Cc: Mark Brown , Nikolai Kondrashov , Helen Koike , linuxtv-ci@linuxtv.org, dave.pigott@collabora.com, mripard@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, gustavo.padovan@collabora.com, pawiecz@collabora.com, tales.aparecida@gmail.com, workflows@vger.kernel.org, kernelci@lists.linux.dev, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, nfraprado@collabora.com, davidgow@google.com, cocci@inria.fr, Julia.Lawall@inria.fr, laura.nao@collabora.com, ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com, kernel@collabora.com, torvalds@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing Message-ID: <20240229122503.GH30889@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20240228225527.1052240-1-helen.koike@collabora.com> <20240228230725.GF1659@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <0a5bf7d1-0a7e-4071-877a-a3d312d80084@gmail.com> <20240229093402.GA30889@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <655f89fa-6ccb-4b54-adcd-69024b4a1e28@gmail.com> <20240229111919.GF30889@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20240229122040.GG30889@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240229122040.GG30889@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > > On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > > > > > >>> Of course. You're also welcome to join the #kernelci channel on libera.chat. > > > > > >> Isn't that a bit pointless if it's no the main IM channel ? > > > > > > It *was* the original channel and still gets some usage (mostly started > > > by me admittedly since I've never joined slack for a bunch of reasons > > > that make it hassle), IIRC the Slack was started because there were some > > > interns who had trouble figuring out IRC and intermittent connectivity > > > but people seem to have migrated. > > > > In fact it was initially created for the members of the Linux > > Foundation project only, which is why registration is moderated > > for emails that don't have a domain linked to a member (BTW not > > any Google account will just work e.g. @gmail.com is moderated, > > only @google.com for Google employees isn't). > > > > And yes IRC is the "least common denominator" chat platform. > > Maybe having a bridge between the main Slack channel and IRC > > would help. > > If the gitlab CI pipeline proposal wants to be considered for inclusion > in the kernel, I think it needs to switch to a free software solution > for its *main* communication channels. And to clarify, I didn't meant the kernel CI project, but only the gitlab CI pipeline for the Linux kernel project. I don't know how tightly integrated the two projects are though. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart