From: Nikolai Kondrashov <Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com>
To: workflows@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@redhat.com>,
CKI <cki-project@redhat.com>,
kernelci@lists.linux.dev,
Nikolai Kondrashov <Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] MAINTAINERS: Add proposal strength to V: entries
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 20:03:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231205184503.79769-11-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231205184503.79769-1-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com>
Require the MAINTAINERS V: entries to begin with a keyword, one of
SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED/REQUIRED, signifying how strongly the test is
proposed for verifying the subsystem changes, prompting
scripts/checkpatch.pl to produce CHECK/WARNING/ERROR messages
respectively, whenever the commit message doesn't have the corresponding
Tested-with: tag.
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Kondrashov <Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com>
---
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 11 ++-
MAINTAINERS | 20 +++--
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 83 ++++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index 45bd1a713ef33..199fadc50cf62 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -233,18 +233,21 @@ Test your changes
Test the patch to the best of your ability. Check the MAINTAINERS file for the
subsystem(s) you are changing to see if there are any **V:** entries
-proposing particular test suites, either directly as commands, or via
-documentation references.
+proposing particular test suites.
+
+The **V:** entries start with a proposal strength keyword
+(SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED/REQUIRED), followed either by a command, or a
+documentation reference.
Test suite references start with a ``*`` (similar to C pointer dereferencing),
followed by the name of the test suite, which would be documented in the
Documentation/process/tests.rst under the corresponding heading. E.g.::
- V: *xfstests
+ V: SUGGESTED *xfstests
Anything not starting with a ``*`` is considered a command. E.g.::
- V: tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
+ V: RECOMMENDED tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
Supplying the ``--test`` option to ``scripts/get_maintainer.pl`` adds **V:**
entries to its output.
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 84e90ec015090..3a35e320b5a5b 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -59,15 +59,19 @@ Descriptions of section entries and preferred order
matches patches or files that contain one or more of the words
printk, pr_info or pr_err
One regex pattern per line. Multiple K: lines acceptable.
- V: *Test suite* proposed for execution. The command that could be
- executed to verify changes to the maintained subsystem, or a reference
- to a test suite documented in Documentation/process/tests.txt.
+ V: *Test suite* proposed for execution for verifying changes to the
+ maintained subsystem. Must start with a proposal strength keyword:
+ (SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED/REQUIRED), followed by the test suite command,
+ or a reference to a test suite documented in
+ Documentation/process/tests.txt.
+ Proposal strengths correspond to checkpatch.pl message levels
+ (CHECK/WARNING/ERROR respectively, whenever Tested-with: is missing).
Commands must be executed from the root of the source tree.
Commands must support the -h/--help option.
References must be preceded with a '*'.
Cannot contain '@' or '#' characters.
- V: tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
- V: *xfstests
+ V: SUGGESTED tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
+ V: RECOMMENDED *xfstests
One test suite per line.
Maintainers List
@@ -7978,7 +7982,7 @@ L: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
S: Maintained
W: http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org
Q: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/list/
-V: *kvm-xfstests smoke
+V: RECOMMENDED *kvm-xfstests smoke
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git
F: Documentation/filesystems/ext4/
F: fs/ext4/
@@ -11628,7 +11632,7 @@ L: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
L: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
S: Maintained
W: https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/
-V: tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
+V: RECOMMENDED tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git kunit
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git kunit-fixes
F: Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/
@@ -18367,7 +18371,7 @@ REGISTER MAP ABSTRACTION
M: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
S: Supported
-V: *kunit
+V: RECOMMENDED *kunit
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git
F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regmap/
F: drivers/base/regmap/
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index bfeb4c33b5424..9438e4f452a6c 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1181,39 +1181,57 @@ sub is_maintained_obsolete {
return $maintained_status{$filename} =~ /obsolete/i;
}
-# Test suites proposed per changed file
+# A list of test proposal strength keywords, weakest to strongest
+our @test_proposal_strengths = qw(suggested recommended required);
+# A regular expression string matching test proposal strength keywords
+my $test_proposal_strengths_res = join('|', @test_proposal_strengths);
+# A regular expression matching valid values of MAINTAINERS V: entries
+# Puts proposal strength into $1 and the test into $2
+my $test_proposal_entry_re = qr/^\s*($test_proposal_strengths_res)\s+([^@#]+?)\s*$/i;
+
+# A hashmap of changed files and references to hashmaps of test suites and the
+# strength (0-2) of their proposal
our %files_proposed_tests = ();
-# Return a list of test suites proposed for execution for a particular file
+# Return a reference to a hashmap of test suites proposed for execution for a
+# particular file, and their proposal strengths - 0, 1, or 2 for
+# SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED/REQUIRED respectively.
sub get_file_proposed_tests {
my ($filename) = @_;
- my $file_proposed_tests;
- return () if (!$tree || !(-e "$root/scripts/get_maintainer.pl"));
+ return {} if (!$tree || !(-e "$root/scripts/get_maintainer.pl"));
if (!exists($files_proposed_tests{$filename})) {
+ # Retrieve and parse the entries
+ my %file_proposed_tests = ();
my $command = "perl $root/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --test --multiline --nogit --nogit-fallback -f $filename";
# Ignore warnings on stderr
my $output = `$command 2>/dev/null`;
# But regenerate stderr on failure
die "Failed retrieving tests proposed for changes to \"$filename\":\n" . `$command 2>&1 >/dev/null` if ($?);
- $file_proposed_tests = [grep { !/@/ } split("\n", $output)];
- # Validate and normalize all references
- for my $index (0 .. scalar @$file_proposed_tests - 1) {
- my $test = $file_proposed_tests->[$index];
- if ($test =~ /^\*\s*(.*)$/) {
- my $name = $1;
- die "Test $name referenced in MAINTAINERS not found in $testsrelfile\n"
- if (!exists $tests{$name});
- $file_proposed_tests->[$index] = "*" . $name;
+ # For each non-email line (a V: entry)
+ foreach my $entry (grep { !/@/ } split("\n", $output)) {
+ # Extract the strength and the test
+ if ($entry =~ $test_proposal_entry_re) {
+ my $strength = grep { $test_proposal_strengths[$_] eq lc($1) }
+ 0..$#test_proposal_strengths;
+ my $test = $2;
+ # Validate and normalize references
+ if ($test =~ /^\*\s*(.*)$/) {
+ my $name = $1;
+ die "Test $name referenced in MAINTAINERS not found in $testsrelfile\n"
+ if (!exists $tests{$name});
+ $test = "*" . $name;
+ }
+ $file_proposed_tests{$test} = $strength;
+ } else {
+ die "Invalid MAINTAINERS V: entry: $entry\n";
}
}
- $files_proposed_tests{$filename} = $file_proposed_tests;
- } else {
- $file_proposed_tests = $files_proposed_tests{$filename};
+ $files_proposed_tests{$filename} = \%file_proposed_tests;
}
- return @$file_proposed_tests;
+ return $files_proposed_tests{$filename};
}
sub is_SPDX_License_valid {
@@ -2761,7 +2779,7 @@ sub process {
my @setup_docs = ();
my $setup_docs = 0;
- # Test suites which should not be proposed for execution
+ # Maximum strength (0-2) of test proposals to be ignored
my %dont_propose_tests = ();
my $camelcase_file_seeded = 0;
@@ -2983,8 +3001,10 @@ sub process {
}
# Check if tests are proposed for changes to the file
- foreach my $test (get_file_proposed_tests($realfile)) {
- next if exists $dont_propose_tests{$test};
+ my $file_proposed_tests = get_file_proposed_tests($realfile);
+ foreach my $test (keys %$file_proposed_tests) {
+ my $strength = $file_proposed_tests->{$test};
+ next if $strength <= ($dont_propose_tests{$test} // -1);
my $name;
my $title;
my $command;
@@ -3000,19 +3020,19 @@ sub process {
$command = $test;
}
if ($command) {
- $message = "Execute the $title " .
- "proposed for verifying changes to $realfile:\n" .
- "$command\n";
+ $message = "Execute the $title $test_proposal_strengths[$strength] " .
+ "for verifying changes to $realfile:\n$command\n";
} else {
- $message = "The $title is proposed for verifying changes to $realfile\n";
+ $message = "The $title is $test_proposal_strengths[$strength] " .
+ "for verifying changes to $realfile\n";
}
if ($name) {
$message .= "See instructions under \"$name\" in $testsrelfile\n";
}
$message .= "Add the following to the tested commit's message, " .
"IF IT PASSES:\nTested-with: $test\n";
- CHK("TEST_PROPOSAL", $message);
- $dont_propose_tests{$test} = 1;
+ (\&CHK, \&WARN, \&ERROR)[$strength]("TEST_PROPOSAL", $message);
+ $dont_propose_tests{$test} = $strength;
}
next;
@@ -3350,7 +3370,7 @@ sub process {
# the test and its subsets
local *dont_propose_test_name = sub {
my ($name) = @_;
- $dont_propose_tests{"*" . $name} = 1;
+ $dont_propose_tests{"*" . $name} = 2;
foreach my $sub_name (keys %tests) {
my $sub_data = $tests{$sub_name};
my $superset = $sub_data->{"superset"};
@@ -3363,7 +3383,7 @@ sub process {
# Else it's a command
} else {
# Do not propose the test
- $dont_propose_tests{$test} = 1;
+ $dont_propose_tests{$test} = 2;
}
}
@@ -3821,9 +3841,10 @@ sub process {
if ($rawline =~ /^\+V:\s*(.*)/) {
my $entry = $1;
# If this is a valid entry value
- if ($entry =~ /^[^@#]*$/) {
+ if ($entry =~ $test_proposal_entry_re) {
+ my $test = $2;
# If the test in the entry is a reference
- if ($entry =~ /^\*\s*(.*)$/) {
+ if ($test =~ /^\*\s*(.*)$/) {
my $name = $1;
ERROR("TEST_PROPOSAL_INVALID",
"Test $name referenced in MAINTAINERS not found in $testsrelfile\n" .
@@ -3831,7 +3852,7 @@ sub process {
}
} else {
ERROR("TEST_PROPOSAL_INVALID",
- "Test proposal cannot contain '\@' or '#' characters\n" . $herecurr);
+ "Invalid test proposal entry: $entry\n" . $herecurr);
}
}
}
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-05 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-15 17:43 [RFC PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: field for required tests Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 18:31 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-15 20:01 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-16 12:00 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 20:14 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-16 12:09 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 20:38 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-16 12:14 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-16 13:26 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-16 13:52 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-20 12:40 ` Gustavo Padovan
2023-11-20 13:31 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-22 17:41 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-16 13:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-11-16 13:41 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-16 13:43 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-11-16 13:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-16 14:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-11-20 13:30 ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2023-11-20 20:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-20 22:27 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-21 6:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-21 10:37 ` David Gow
2023-11-21 13:27 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-22 16:16 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-21 18:24 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-21 18:02 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-21 10:36 ` David Gow
2023-11-21 20:48 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-22 17:19 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-22 1:08 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-15 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: Require kvm-xfstests smoke for ext4 Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 18:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-16 16:33 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-17 7:09 ` Chandan Babu R
2023-11-19 22:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-22 14:44 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-22 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-22 17:44 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-22 20:51 ` Dave Chinner
2023-11-15 17:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Require kunit core tests for framework changes Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-20 18:48 ` Daniel Latypov
2023-11-22 17:38 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: entry for tests Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] get_maintainer: Survive querying missing files Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:55 ` Joe Perches
2023-12-06 16:16 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2024-01-31 13:55 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: entry for tests Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:58 ` Joe Perches
2023-12-06 16:21 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-06 8:12 ` David Gow
2023-12-06 16:23 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-06 16:38 ` Joe Perches
2023-12-06 16:57 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] MAINTAINERS: Propose kunit core tests for framework changes Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] docs: submitting-patches: Introduce Tested-with: Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:59 ` Jonathan Corbet
2023-12-05 19:07 ` Joe Perches
2023-12-06 10:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-12-06 16:46 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-06 16:31 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] checkpatch: Propose tests to execute Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] MAINTAINERS: Support referencing test docs in V: Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-06 8:03 ` David Gow
2023-12-06 16:54 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] MAINTAINERS: Propose kvm-xfstests smoke for ext4 Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] docs: tests: Document kunit in general Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] MAINTAINERS: Propose kunit tests for regmap Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` Nikolai Kondrashov [this message]
2024-01-08 10:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: entry for tests Nikolai Kondrashov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231205184503.79769-11-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com \
--to=nikolai.kondrashov@redhat.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kernelci@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vkabatov@redhat.com \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox