From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BA7C6FA8F for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 22:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245328AbjH3WMR (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2023 18:12:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46408 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245332AbjH3WMQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2023 18:12:16 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1771A4; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495A662351; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 22:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 260A1C433C9; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 22:07:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1693433229; bh=iOlG6QCwPEJAv18mUAR+gdYgQ3y/Ze8QpP2zXy4kL3o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=OSGioPeq7kf+PXKsN9z4re0fo54QSQB74WhbvhWvlQ9x1HR+fMd0ddWlA8zQDRA6X kKLqf95hKIZKgoZfEBNc+EuV2GsjbsOOicm323e1xCIg39xa/NnIdCoMlpfxgt0Izw FjKy7RpolV5TiAkHKpYnruB1xCWCFyaXfBaQY6mX9RQyxTBbxpA9ZmpDH6M+LnISpL NILcX4ZyRnz6+qAWAfmNeus3GNMTU7dsWZ3BzHrNkyFP0RFBqLjA1Xp41iyS9eKOpL edDfpkjxispR+CgX2ute1NZKTfZObfkgLMW+vgOGU1O92+kfqy8XEpIihd3ZzdxYre Vb+B6gkcZ6y9A== From: Jakub Kicinski To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, Jakub Kicinski , corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com Subject: [PATCH net v2] docs: netdev: document patchwork patch states Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:06:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20230830220659.170911-1-kuba@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org The patchwork states are largely self-explanatory but small ambiguities may still come up. Document how we interpret the states in networking. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- v2: - add a sentence about New vs Under Review - s/maintainer/export/ for Needs ACK - fix indent v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230828184447.2142383-1-kuba@kernel.org/ CC: corbet@lwn.net CC: workflows@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org CC: rdunlap@infradead.org CC: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com --- Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst index c1c732e9748b..b2c082e64c95 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst @@ -120,7 +120,34 @@ Status of a patch can be checked by looking at the main patchwork https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/ The "State" field will tell you exactly where things are at with your -patch. Patches are indexed by the ``Message-ID`` header of the emails +patch: + +================== ============================================================= +Patch state Description +================== ============================================================= +New, Under review pending review, patch is in the maintainer’s queue for + review; the two states are used interchangeably (depending on + the exact co-maintainer handling patchwork at the time) +Accepted patch was applied to the appropriate networking tree, this is + usually set automatically by the pw-bot +Needs ACK waiting for an ack from an area expert or testing +Changes requested patch has not passed the review, new revision is expected + with appropriate code and commit message changes +Rejected patch has been rejected and new revision is not expected +Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking + subsystem +Awaiting upstream patch should be reviewed and handled by appropriate + sub-maintainer, who will send it on to the networking trees +Deferred patch needs to be reposted later, usually due to dependency + or because it was posted for a closed tree +Superseded new version of the patch was posted, usually set by the + pw-bot +RFC not to be applied, usually not in maintainer’s review queue, + pw-bot can automatically set patches to this state based + on subject tags +================== ============================================================= + +Patches are indexed by the ``Message-ID`` header of the emails which carried them so if you have trouble finding your patch append the value of ``Message-ID`` to the URL above. -- 2.41.0