Re: Selective lei filters and replies to old threads

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 08:02:34PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 04:15:54PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >> [0] Side note: if anyone has a nice trick to specifically exclude Greg's
> >> stable patch bombs from this, I would be interested in hearing about
> >> that as well :)
> >
> > I thought those stable patch bombs had a X- header on them, like:
> > 	X-stable: review
> > and
> > 	X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore
> > but somehow it looks like I'm only adding that to the first message in
> > the stable-patch-bomb series.
> >
> > Would it help for me to fix my side and add those headers to make it
> > easier for you to be able to ignore them?
> 
> I don't think it's possible to match on arbitrary headers in Lore
> searches (maybe public-inbox could be taught that?), but it would
> certainly aid in adding local filtering after fetching which would work
> for me as a workaround. So yes, please! :)

Turned out my scripts were broken, and the header I was supposed to be
putting on all stable patches was no longer happening (something changed
in git format-patch's output I think.)

So this should be now fixed up with the latest 5.10.192-rc1 announcement
and emails.

thanks,

greg k-h