From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A703EE4996 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232349AbjHUO53 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:57:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43474 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234074AbjHUO53 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:57:29 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B8BE8; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 07:57:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D8EA613EA; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 423BEC433C8; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:57:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692629844; bh=81+nv/icHm8Osb2n8YAqxJA369nqyLSBAVtVs6fRHWw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DgPUKUyomJkxjqH/7WJuL/3m4moNAp9/mTDCRqUrNAL+4z68IXfmQgcbLokALLFqP 6dAVTMdCToCgORIvzJ9/5nuyWn0P1j38qlrldcENRtmmlU3KGd5x2qGBYdjb7FgpoM qxs9z2HWW4kXAjVMNzqVMLPqr3arCGkbiVQ0dpIoNqRixt7mjrSo/wlbbhMaUbVg+e idpYDhrYcfmUN9M75Irvs57od8f1L0I2OgOI9khHO7hErhlG2Flzby0iWZAajP4RoF 6g8m+eXKiAP6XmgwcpfjCG0hjBnsfTTVAl9j+Q/IIECnIHZZdAlFf4B4YPkYArRPzG s4Qkvzq5u0hkA== Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 07:57:23 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Giulio Benetti , Laurent Pinchart , Jonathan Corbet , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] docs: submitting-patches: Add Sponsored-by tag to give credits to who sponsored the patch Message-ID: <20230821075723.17944dcb@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230817220957.41582-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> <20230817220957.41582-2-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> <20230817232348.GC1175@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <28289906-4fd1-26aa-b1c4-eb393ac52d48@benettiengineering.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:40:59 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Personally, I would respond "I'm sorry, but the only advertising > space we offer are Copyright headers (for employees) and > "user+customer@..." or "name (customer) user@..." (for contractors). +1 > And this is a separate tag, so it's harder for the analysis tools > (whose output your customers must be interested in, too?) to > match the tag to the actual Author/Reviewer/... I think that's a key point. Having a separate tag denote the sponsor would make analysis a lot harder. We'd need to start writing parsers with much more context awareness.