From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831DBC001DD for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233172AbjGLJtk (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:49:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60024 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231472AbjGLJtj (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2023 05:49:39 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236FD1734; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 02:49:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1689155371; x=1720691371; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=7AaIohzmGHW88bh4A6tVGoqvBNMogRuXtIs67YR2RQE=; b=IEmqsRZKuFdGI0OY/S94qhf2/9DMPq8ICNJYmYTR8B/+7L3zI8+ssjlw J9puuEMi5ZcdVyu+YOQkZokiNwroNv+dbNDUzEDCrvcNISWZ/TL6jLp6y mIt/NnXOeixOSY6wpP8LZ5Rm7tNml45TmHV0styjMU3tcNIkyMkIes6Bm 2Q1yzZiAZ9CsMamzvEyOvjkOJ+uSeLHqYB2OdmbK0SEC7cMxsaahhRc6Y 9/Wh5KbBC7AELFhSLKVwFxS56+60WXYVJCDR/ktEHq+Ab1i2Ctwlkf0qy a8VJbozxzqyALqtZfUYqM2qbfIj4+NZ1EnesePJbRXHmK/TI+IYoIKQmS Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,199,1684825200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="222577993" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 12 Jul 2023 02:49:30 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 02:49:30 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 02:49:28 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 10:48:57 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , , Jonathan Corbet , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: document dtbs_check requirement for Samsung Message-ID: <20230712-skier-ribcage-0d82be7e16fd@wendy> References: <20230712084131.127982-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jnDx7med4PR7Ca25" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230712084131.127982-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org --jnDx7med4PR7Ca25 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:41:31AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Samsung ARM/ARM64 SoCs (except legacy S5PV210) are also expected not to > bring any new dtbs_check warnings. In fact this have been already > enforced and tested since few release. >=20 > Cc: Conor Dooley > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >=20 > --- > Not sure where to document this. Creating new maintainer profile for > Samsung SoC would be an overkill. OTOH, more SoCs might want to grow > this list, so this also scales poor. To me, this portion of the document was "information to the submaintainer", which would be you, not information to the contributors to the platform. Adding the comment about Samsung SoC seems aimed at contributors? I added the bit about W=3D1 on RISC-V since there are multiple sub-maintainers there. > --- > Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst b/Documentation/pro= cess/maintainer-soc.rst > index 49f08289d62c..12637530d68f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst > @@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ with the dt-bindings that describe the ABI. Please r= ead the section > more information on the validation of devicetrees. > =20 > For new platforms, or additions to existing ones, ``make dtbs_check`` sh= ould not > -add any new warnings. For RISC-V, as it has the advantage of being a ne= wer > -architecture, ``make dtbs_check W=3D1`` is required to not add any new w= arnings. > +add any new warnings. For RISC-V and Samsung SoC, ``make dtbs_check W= =3D1`` is > +required to not add any new warnings. > If in any doubt about a devicetree change, reach out to the devicetree > maintainers. > =20 > --=20 > 2.34.1 >=20 --jnDx7med4PR7Ca25 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZK53CQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0g01AP9J2DO5r+KESygofbiZ5DRbA3R+nDW85who/mRtjzDaRgD/a2fBQPx9uYgQ PMTDslMGKoeOXIwmcEChxspAVZkyGwc= =Mk6D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jnDx7med4PR7Ca25--