workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	security@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: clarify CVE handling
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:35:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202307031131.51907BC65@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023070335-groggily-catfish-9ad5@gregkh>

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:00:15PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:08:00AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >   The security team does not assign CVEs, nor do we require them for
> >   reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and may
> >   delay the bug handling.  If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier
> >   assigned, they should find one by themselves, for example by contacting
> >   MITRE directly.  However under no circumstances will a patch inclusion
> >   be delayed to wait for a CVE identifier to arrive.
> > 
> > This puts the responsibility for finding one in time on the reporter
> > depending on what they expect, and if they want it in the commit
> > message, they'd rather have one before reporting the problem.
> 
> Oh, nice wording, let me steal that!  :)

Yeah, this is good. The last sentence is a little hard to parse, so how
about this, with a little more rationale expansion:

However under no circumstances will patch publication be delayed for
CVE identifier assignment. Getting fixes landed takes precedence; the
CVE database entry will already reference the commit, so there is no loss
of information if the CVE is assigned later.


-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-03 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-30  7:14 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: update preferences when dealing with the linux-distros group Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30  7:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: clarify CVE handling Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30  7:21   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 18:18   ` Kees Cook
2023-07-02 12:39     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03  4:08       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 15:00         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 18:35           ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-07-03 19:05             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 19:26               ` Kees Cook
2023-07-03 19:35                 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: update preferences when dealing with the linux-distros group Kees Cook
2023-07-03 15:00   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 15:01     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202307031131.51907BC65@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox