From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: clarify CVE handling
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:35:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202307031131.51907BC65@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023070335-groggily-catfish-9ad5@gregkh>
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:00:15PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:08:00AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > The security team does not assign CVEs, nor do we require them for
> > reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and may
> > delay the bug handling. If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier
> > assigned, they should find one by themselves, for example by contacting
> > MITRE directly. However under no circumstances will a patch inclusion
> > be delayed to wait for a CVE identifier to arrive.
> >
> > This puts the responsibility for finding one in time on the reporter
> > depending on what they expect, and if they want it in the commit
> > message, they'd rather have one before reporting the problem.
>
> Oh, nice wording, let me steal that! :)
Yeah, this is good. The last sentence is a little hard to parse, so how
about this, with a little more rationale expansion:
However under no circumstances will patch publication be delayed for
CVE identifier assignment. Getting fixes landed takes precedence; the
CVE database entry will already reference the commit, so there is no loss
of information if the CVE is assigned later.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 7:14 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: update preferences when dealing with the linux-distros group Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 7:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: clarify CVE handling Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 7:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-30 18:18 ` Kees Cook
2023-07-02 12:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 4:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-07-03 15:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 18:35 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-07-03 19:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 19:26 ` Kees Cook
2023-07-03 19:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: security-bugs.rst: update preferences when dealing with the linux-distros group Kees Cook
2023-07-03 15:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-03 15:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202307031131.51907BC65@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox