From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94F2C77B73 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229660AbjFERal (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:30:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48664 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233724AbjFERad (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:30:33 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37421A7; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6CE628A3; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB9D6C433EF; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:30:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1685986231; bh=9m6zpJRHDtWhs+jhcP594GpAc8H96hqh8ddH++zqf1M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SDnrCzc34KaXkUdrLiONT/0h6AKmjJN9NOmZPmYxSq0ECrIMaOnL8V2VypkZ1RS53 6EuWirew/W3OH+kiik8LIeGNBNhr+4q5s6ACBbWHEMKlL9Mc9PnkTz2BwNVhoRHjPc O99Vmhepi+WK5ueSlvR3dg2m48gWcI+TxsR4IwD1oqlFTtu4j9foz+QCguNvBR3A4c yumAKnAxsWIa06zgvztYzZ4ro+N3pSARZf2DP/UZNMiDwGFLpPO5srNpHTnnKizER3 Po1tCQU5ov8l1aXXWG5HW6RRhtBwVnoEvNfXVhGNGxfzPA1Th27ptgj7eVSXMkGRpj 2t8bxXcVUIcJw== Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:30:29 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Kalle Valo Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Willy Tarreau , Randy Dunlap , James Seo , Jonathan Corbet , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc' lists Message-ID: <20230605103029.3fb821db@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <87v8g2hwm1.fsf@kernel.org> References: <20230603151447.29288-1-james@equiv.tech> <975d35cb-e0aa-8ea7-5520-238d1aa4cbaf@infradead.org> <20230603160659.GA5182@1wt.eu> <20230604112644.49ac2035@kernel.org> <20230605041258.GA22604@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <87v8g2hwm1.fsf@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:22:46 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: > > Note that some maintainers process pull requests from patchwork, not > > from their mailbox, and prefer not to be aadressed in the To or CC > > headers. I don't know how widespread that is. > > FWIW I belong to this group and prefer not be in To or Cc, I'll always > check the patch from patchwork. Ah, I didn't realize this.