workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@gmx.com>
Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Introducing bugbot
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 13:35:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230404-uncrown-detonate-8bc1ac@meerkat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <022e2ef8-2a94-3109-ab90-9ee980915887@gmx.com>

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:16:08PM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> I love everything about what you've done except I've got a minor feature
> request for the kernel bugzilla and this new workflow specifically.

Great to hear.

> Let's have a bot which polls open bug reports every 3-6 months with this
> question:
> 
> "Is this still an issue in the current kernel? Please leave a comment or
> this bug report will be closed due to inactivity".

I plan to do it slightly differently -- there will be a "housekeeping" command
running daily that will auto-close bugs that haven't seen any activity for a
defined period (90 days, for example), with a message like:

"This bug is now closed due to inactivity. Please reopen if this issue is
still relevant with the latest kernel version."

> By doing this we could make the bugzilla a whole more relevant and effective
> tool instead of having a ton of bug reports no one cares about or can even
> confirm.
> 
> I would only exclude the bug reports of type "Enhancement".

I wouldn't, because these aren't bugs and shouldn't be filed in bugzilla. I
would just advise the person who opened the bug where they should send an
email with their ideas and then close with "RESOLVED/MOVED".

-K

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-04 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-03 21:45 Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-04-03 21:47 ` Kernel.org Bugbot
2023-04-03 21:51   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-04-04  5:58 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-04-04  6:57   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-04-04  8:16   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-04-04 12:36   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-04-04 12:55     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-04-04 16:16 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2023-04-04 17:25   ` Mark Brown
2023-04-04 17:35   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev [this message]
2023-04-04 21:39     ` David Sterba
2023-04-08 12:10 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-04-12 12:23   ` Kalle Valo
2023-04-12 14:07     ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-04-12 16:47       ` Kalle Valo
2023-05-05 15:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-05 19:12   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-05-05 19:32     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-05 19:39       ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-05-05 19:43         ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230404-uncrown-detonate-8bc1ac@meerkat \
    --to=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=aros@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox