workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	users@linux.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Github PR bot questions
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 12:07:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617170756.GA27599@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72k0_P8vxMwUT154oBRPevRKbz7-34zQ-toPjMfhAKUzrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:13:55PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 7:55 PM Konstantin Ryabitsev
> <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Unless I'm misreading the docs, the submitter should be able to reopen the
> > closed pull request, so it's not a permanent action. This may actually make it
> > easier to track things for v1/v2, since we wouldn't need to continuously poll
> > open pull requests to see if any of them changed.
> 
> For versioning, what I request at the moment is that people force-push
> their PR, overwriting the previous set of commits, rather than sending
> a new PR. Then people write in the GitHub-PR-message (which we use as
> the cover letter) the diff/updates, if any. The bot detects changes
> and pushes a new review every time, and hides its own past messages
> (i.e. for previous versions).

In Jenkins that gives you /1 /2 /3 etc versions, but IIRC doesn't doing
this in github lead to lost commits?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-16 17:18 Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 17:24 ` Drew DeVault
2021-06-16 17:47 ` Johannes Berg
2021-06-16 17:55   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:13     ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 17:07       ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
     [not found] ` <CAJhbpm_BgbSx581HU0mTCkcE28n_hRx=tv74az_mE2VBmPtrVA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-06-16 18:05   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:11 ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-16 18:22   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:38     ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-16 20:10 ` Willy Tarreau
2021-06-17 15:11   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:25     ` Willy Tarreau
2021-06-16 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-17 15:09   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 21:11 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16 21:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-16 21:59     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16 22:33   ` James Bottomley
2021-06-17 14:18     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 14:27       ` James Bottomley
2021-06-17  6:52   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17  8:20     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  8:55       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17  9:33         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  9:52           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-17 14:33         ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 15:24           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17 15:38             ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 15:45             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 14:02     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 14:47   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:25     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-06-17 15:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 15:53         ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-17 17:15     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17  6:37 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  7:30 ` Greg KH
2021-06-17 14:59   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17  8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17  8:33   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-06-17  9:52     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17 10:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 14:57         ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:16           ` Mark Brown
2021-06-17 15:24             ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-17 16:36               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-17 18:43               ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 15:31             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-17 17:06               ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-17 22:35                 ` Jiri Kosina
2021-06-17 14:23       ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 20:42 ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210617170756.GA27599@mail.hallyn.com \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox