workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: users@linux.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Github PR bot questions
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:10:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210616201011.GA2348@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210616171813.bwvu6mtl4ltotf7p@nitro.local>

Hi Konstantin,

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:18:13PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> - We can *probably* track when patch series get applied and auto-close pull
>   requests that are accepted

In haproxy we have a bot that forwards PRs to the mailing list. It
CCs the author and sends a gentle message saying that reviews are
made in public using plain-text e-mails, and that for this reason
the PR is automatically closed. And I think it's easier for both
sides, because users who are used to PRs would probably count a bit
too much on the "github mode", where they're certain that someone
will eventually notice that the PR count went from 1137 to 1138 and
will have a look, while it's certain that there will be quite some
losses, and by warning the submitter upfront there is less surprise.

In addition, responding to reviews over e-mail and having the submitter
do the same along the discussion basically means that everyone will
forget about closing the issue. Also one of the benefits of e-mail is
that maintainers can ultimately fix some typos in the commit message
or adjust the subject before committing, something which will quickly
confuse the bot.

For these reasons I think that instant close (with a gentle message)
will be more robust.

Just my two cents,
Willy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-16 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-16 17:18 Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 17:24 ` Drew DeVault
2021-06-16 17:47 ` Johannes Berg
2021-06-16 17:55   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:13     ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 17:07       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found] ` <CAJhbpm_BgbSx581HU0mTCkcE28n_hRx=tv74az_mE2VBmPtrVA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-06-16 18:05   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:11 ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-16 18:22   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 18:38     ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-16 20:10 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2021-06-17 15:11   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:25     ` Willy Tarreau
2021-06-16 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-17 15:09   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-16 21:11 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16 21:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-16 21:59     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16 22:33   ` James Bottomley
2021-06-17 14:18     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 14:27       ` James Bottomley
2021-06-17  6:52   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17  8:20     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  8:55       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17  9:33         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  9:52           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-17 14:33         ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 15:24           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-17 15:38             ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 15:45             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 14:02     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17 14:47   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:25     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-06-17 15:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 15:53         ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-17 17:15     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-17  6:37 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17  7:30 ` Greg KH
2021-06-17 14:59   ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17  8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17  8:33   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-06-17  9:52     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-06-17 10:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 14:57         ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-06-17 15:16           ` Mark Brown
2021-06-17 15:24             ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-17 16:36               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-06-17 18:43               ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 15:31             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-17 17:06               ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-17 22:35                 ` Jiri Kosina
2021-06-17 14:23       ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-06-17 20:42 ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210616201011.GA2348@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox