From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D21EC47404 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 18:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AAF02070B for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 18:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728081AbfJGSpO (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:45:14 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:56268 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728079AbfJGSpO (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:45:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [50.237.170.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D038114735CF0; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 20:45:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20191007.204512.1827066230578138833.davem@davemloft.net> To: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: sir@cmpwn.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: thoughts on a Merge Request based development workflow From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20191007114752.0ac7f041@gandalf.local.home> References: <20191007.173329.2182256975398971437.davem@davemloft.net> <20191007114752.0ac7f041@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: workflows-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org From: Steven Rostedt Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:47:52 -0400 > I want tools that work, and are versatile. If you have a replacement > that's not a "one size fits all", where you can build any client > against it (like we have with email), then I will be very happy. But > forcing everyone to a single workflow is going to be a huge step > backwards. I want good infrastructure upon which arbitrary tooling can be built on top too, so I'm glad that our goals align :-) But building it on top of email is very unwise in my opinion.