* [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst @ 2026-03-08 10:08 LIU Haoyang 2026-03-09 1:22 ` Dongliang Mu 2026-03-09 16:10 ` Jonathan Corbet 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: LIU Haoyang @ 2026-03-08 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall, Nicolas Palix, Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan Cc: LIU Haoyang, cocci, workflows, linux-doc, linux-kernel The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not found page, thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> --- Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the script. -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst 2026-03-08 10:08 [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst LIU Haoyang @ 2026-03-09 1:22 ` Dongliang Mu 2026-03-09 16:10 ` Jonathan Corbet 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Dongliang Mu @ 2026-03-09 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: LIU Haoyang Cc: Julia Lawall, Nicolas Palix, Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, cocci, workflows, linux-doc, linux-kernel On Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 6:09 PM LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> wrote: > > The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is > https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not found page, > thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, > which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. > Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn> > Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> > --- > Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation > > For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: > > -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck > +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html > > The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the script. > > -- > 2.53.0 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst 2026-03-08 10:08 [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst LIU Haoyang 2026-03-09 1:22 ` Dongliang Mu @ 2026-03-09 16:10 ` Jonathan Corbet 2026-03-09 16:28 ` Haoyang Liu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2026-03-09 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: LIU Haoyang, Julia Lawall, Nicolas Palix, Shuah Khan Cc: LIU Haoyang, cocci, workflows, linux-doc, linux-kernel LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> writes: > The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is > https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not found page, > thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, > which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. > > Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> > --- > Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation > > For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: > > -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck > +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html > > The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the script. I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one. But is there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE CONTENT" at the top? Thanks, jon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst 2026-03-09 16:10 ` Jonathan Corbet @ 2026-03-09 16:28 ` Haoyang Liu 2026-03-10 0:10 ` Nicolas Palix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Haoyang Liu @ 2026-03-09 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Corbet, Julia Lawall, Nicolas Palix, Shuah Khan Cc: cocci, workflows, linux-doc, linux-kernel On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> writes: > >> The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is >> https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not found page, >> thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, >> which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. >> >> Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> >> --- >> Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >> index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation >> >> For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: >> >> -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck >> +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html >> >> The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the script. > I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one. But is > there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE > CONTENT" at the top? Dear Jon, Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I have to use it even though it's obsolete. Sincerely, Haoyang > > Thanks, > > jon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst 2026-03-09 16:28 ` Haoyang Liu @ 2026-03-10 0:10 ` Nicolas Palix 2026-03-10 7:39 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Palix @ 2026-03-10 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Haoyang Liu, Jonathan Corbet, Julia Lawall, Shuah Khan Cc: cocci, workflows, linux-doc, linux-kernel Hi, Maybe we can just throw away that section of "Supplemental documentation" and its link ? Nowadays, there is much more SmPL provided, and the rst file describes better and up-to-date information. Would a link to https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/coccinelle.html be useful to point to latest version ? Sincerely, Le 09/03/2026 à 17:28, Haoyang Liu a écrit : > > On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is >>> https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not >>> found page, >>> thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, >>> which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/ >>> dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >>> index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >>> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation >>> For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: >>> -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck >>> +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html >>> The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of >>> the script. >> I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one. But is >> there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE >> CONTENT" at the top? > > Dear Jon, > > Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I > have to use it even though it's obsolete. > > Sincerely, > Haoyang > >> >> Thanks, >> >> jon > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst 2026-03-10 0:10 ` Nicolas Palix @ 2026-03-10 7:39 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2026-03-10 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicolas Palix Cc: Haoyang Liu, Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, cocci, workflows, linux-doc, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2178 bytes --] On Tue, 10 Mar 2026, Nicolas Palix wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe we can just throw away that section of "Supplemental documentation" and > its link ? > > Nowadays, there is much more SmPL provided, and the rst file > describes better and up-to-date information. > > Would a link to > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/coccinelle.html > be useful to point to latest version ? OK, thanks. There is also an out of date URL in that page. I will send a patch. julia > > Sincerely, > > Le 09/03/2026 à 17:28, Haoyang Liu a écrit : > > > > On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is > > > > https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not > > > > found page, > > > > thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, > > > > which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <tttturtleruss@gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/ > > > > dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation > > > > For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: > > > > -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck > > > > +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html > > > > The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the > > > > script. > > > I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one. But is > > > there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE > > > CONTENT" at the top? > > > > Dear Jon, > > > > Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I > > have to use it even though it's obsolete. > > > > Sincerely, > > Haoyang > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > jon > > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-10 7:39 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-03-08 10:08 [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst LIU Haoyang 2026-03-09 1:22 ` Dongliang Mu 2026-03-09 16:10 ` Jonathan Corbet 2026-03-09 16:28 ` Haoyang Liu 2026-03-10 0:10 ` Nicolas Palix 2026-03-10 7:39 ` Julia Lawall
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox