From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zm-mta-out-3.u-ga.fr (zm-mta-out-3.u-ga.fr [152.77.200.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629A972618; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=152.77.200.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773101824; cv=none; b=UkL7xs5W9J5+cRzDXXfxUk83Bz3gI0EeiVkQLwcVP+4TmEq0G3+RGQm8go+BBIAk8cJ7CFVKr3IwxBgbcv7VqXPPSd+azVEtCFyRFrz7PH8aEM/rXmMao4D+6k0Ol1jkg7F35EklhyA+CVOg34Cgh5DiulUtwldx4Gw8dcYRuVI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773101824; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K6KOjirwWu6hxLyRAT0WLc1dq0LGNWS7j6XYIxLCRp4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=K2EYQ8J5JLZi3sgojN4fdYpNmnpd4s28g46RVjCY+qW15JU5CJO4C+E5z1rf4KqWFFw1iTZ2jUJpjpSLPtGUjMo7W1m/h8EkLD+vhvprN7B1z6Gg/SCalQh2RaPLq/7kuXCFvZIIKShCSw3dSoMOOulZ9Sf8xu0+CJd1TQ6Fdvg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=imag.fr; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=imag.fr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=imag.fr header.i=@imag.fr header.b=NIc6lULV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=152.77.200.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=imag.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=imag.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=imag.fr header.i=@imag.fr header.b="NIc6lULV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=imag.fr; s=2022; t=1773101453; bh=K6KOjirwWu6hxLyRAT0WLc1dq0LGNWS7j6XYIxLCRp4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=NIc6lULVwjAeqp6WE0ElnY6ST1AgwRGFDZN3mHE63R7YP1YqhLRUx0bLLRm46Limv zpB+Vivjr7sDT9k2lwjDVt8OqFXXyjTSQVwjMPm49GyQapxMYgYs+ZRN55yTswbPAc KkufhVOXj/EGmukFqwx+3duBr9LXWy5Vu002kli7aDgQD9iuriXE21sYy2QW/gmR+P sgAh1X8wAFswrU3bXR+ohxFn06z4pv26IKZXuS6xaidS/GP1Qd0NsUEpoZZKPBx8I9 VqPyEBe0nawTfCRfHIAWuUh29cHvlhL4bL+G8FiJBXpyK7iweA4/nQEzLnWnk40ZSn 2Vwg/3QOFoEjg== Received: from mailhub-2.u-ga.fr (mailhub-2.u-ga.fr [129.88.178.102]) by zm-mta-out-3.u-ga.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E6B40277; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 01:10:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr (smtps3.u-ga.fr [195.83.24.62]) by mailhub-2.u-ga.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20ACFF853; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 01:10:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.87] (unknown [87.89.124.250]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: palixn@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr) by smtps.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CBD8400E6; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 01:10:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1c546ad7-14f8-4695-9754-32a020f8a082@imag.fr> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 01:10:52 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst To: Haoyang Liu , Jonathan Corbet , Julia Lawall , Shuah Khan Cc: cocci@inria.fr, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260308100851.341-1-tttturtleruss@gmail.com> <87v7f5vv9x.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Content-Language: en-US, fr From: Nicolas Palix Organization: LIG In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Whitelist-UGA SMTP Authentifie (palixn@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr) via submission-587 ACL (41) Hi, Maybe we can just throw away that section of "Supplemental documentation" and its link ? Nowadays, there is much more SmPL provided, and the rst file describes better and up-to-date information. Would a link to https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/coccinelle.html be useful to point to latest version ? Sincerely, Le 09/03/2026 à 17:28, Haoyang Liu a écrit : > > On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> LIU Haoyang writes: >> >>> The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is >>> https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not >>> found page, >>> thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, >>> which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang >>> --- >>>   Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- >>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/ >>> dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >>> index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >>> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation >>>   For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: >>> -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck >>> +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html >>>   The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of >>> the script. >> I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one.  But is >> there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE >> CONTENT" at the top? > > Dear Jon, > > Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I > have to use it even though it's obsolete. > > Sincerely, > Haoyang > >> >> Thanks, >> >> jon > > > >