Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] coding-style: recommend reusing macros from split headers instead of kernel.h

[Yueh-Shun Li <shamrocklee@posteo.net>]

On 2024-01-09 03:37, Yueh-Shun Li wrote:
> Dear Maintainers,
> 
> In this version of patch series, I drop the patch abouth the nameing
> conflicts caused by locally-defined macro variants to streamline the
> documentation.[1]
> 
> This series of patches targets the "Linux kernel coding style"
> documentation and recommend reusing macros inside the include/linux
> directory instead of the obsolete header "include/linux/kernel.h".
> 
> This addresses the issue 'Irrelevant documentation recommending the use
> of "include/linux/kernel.h"'[2][3] and help deprecating "kernel.h".
> 
> This series contains the update to the zh_TW and zh_CN translation of
> the corresponding documentation changes.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Shamrock
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/87ederwuid.fsf@meer.lwn.net/
> [2]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/bc63acd7ef43bdd8d9609fa48dbf92f9@posteo.net/
> [3]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/107b6b5e-ca14-4b2b-ba2e-38ecd74c0ad3@infradead.org/
> 
> Yueh-Shun Li (3):
>   coding-style: recommend split headers instead of kernel.h
>   doc/zh_TW: coding-style: update content for section 18
>   doc/zh_CN: coding-style: update content of section 18
> 
>  Documentation/process/coding-style.rst        | 24 ++++++++++---------
>  .../zh_CN/process/coding-style.rst            | 22 ++++++++---------
>  .../zh_TW/process/coding-style.rst            | 22 ++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

This series of patches didn't make it to the lists due to my loose ends.
Sorry for the noise.

Sincerely,

Shamrock