From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0555AC7EE29 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 14:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231244AbjFDOBf (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2023 10:01:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45850 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229635AbjFDOBe (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2023 10:01:34 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E6DCCF; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1b01d912924so36138905ad.1; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685887293; x=1688479293; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SGHDepzavGuE83PchG6Ifo8HIEjyqsZ7nz/7LX1OmGI=; b=ExlXXAf4O6jig1b/rfi43C25mDdUj5bJQHMsQMp5mBNHGPQmNDgxGDZhQdoJTxvt+w 1RuEvxdKrjJmTHhaibE6j9a2lkbR7GX9a1YbvxMsYx+70EfEcbW68PKn230qhxNSYvyN wCF68SZcJqkkp91Pm/sIIzSJ9RzQCjkNHe/MzlSkn6XeNcTjEMLlZ/xGlHM8pZr1oKp6 e1bqmBvy0eE7g8Jgk4NiSy32bc5Ji28CPa1u3ShZRvlw/c0GH4751Vq+hmz6pWM6e2kJ eNr4UyXH48zt1fMrqsAX8fHfOwUb2fMfd1eowirXpTcy9F6+8mQz49EtLQx3r3zttKAq R85Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685887293; x=1688479293; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SGHDepzavGuE83PchG6Ifo8HIEjyqsZ7nz/7LX1OmGI=; b=M0Gl1sZjks3MHOSiR1sJkJEsezFAeSGi9vN462KQHCcSD44wMOSJLaurhaoKAwORTU sI7MEYc3MJ4O0UkMYp/Ju/T/KTW8xe94DS1kyUNuQlXSeln+X/ZcVEKABqg/hDYKUwl8 bMBMnkWanl4708azg2h8pxYIHZd0K0ebwKetcJDh7K681RNNnt68+OndQ7tPOYB4HqkV adqgJpm8Mbmp6Kjttd6g6M36IGFs6V4Kj/Ot5dEJXQX1FTui8dcmXT98iOBZj6026hL3 1ondcNEXV9eA0z3q88Zfxt3EPeuyMT1Cqdr8qMe3SZlpz3de9rLg3Cka+H3eHSwuVJwy V6Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDw7+PRo5MS30MYC8VvG/J2+g4JgT9sk9qD29ET7WDtla82qr5M9 1s0NknYXxMHCNxZkGHJfNNg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5olLI4H9tXFHWVTFNSmHMVCx5b78J0aCp08Om7tek2DOOaEL+crIoRBFaJK7sobABtfmcvww== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f550:b0:1af:c1a7:3bb5 with SMTP id h16-20020a170902f55000b001afc1a73bb5mr6244163plf.4.1685887293403; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 07:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs28-116-206-12-54.three.co.id. [116.206.12.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l4-20020a170903244400b001a96a6877fdsm4763410pls.3.2023.06.04.07.01.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Jun 2023 07:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10e68064-42a3-c80e-10cc-079a3cf4eb35@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 21:01:29 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2 Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc' lists Content-Language: en-US To: James Seo , Jonathan Corbet Cc: Kalle Valo , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230603151447.29288-1-james@equiv.tech> From: Bagas Sanjaya In-Reply-To: <20230603151447.29288-1-james@equiv.tech> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org On 6/3/23 22:14, James Seo wrote: > To reduce ambiguity and eliminate this class of potential (albeit > tangential) issues, prescribe sending patches 'To' maintainers and > 'Cc' lists. While we're at it, strengthen the recommendation to use > scripts/get_maintainer.pl to find patch recipients, and move Andrew > Morton's callout as the maintainer of last resort to the next > paragraph for better flow. > IMO, To: and Cc: don't have any practical differences between two, and I usually do vice-versa when sending patches: lists are in To: and individual maintainers are in Cc: Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara