linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	 mcgrof@kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,  kbusch@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
	chandan.babu@oracle.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 02/14] filemap: align the index to mapping_min_order in the page cache
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 22:13:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <zjxq2so7fx3di7pa57nymko2cvfe7ugg6qtxasqbb6ziupy5ye@q4f6kddng5ro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487c0bec-4229-4add-bec4-1711f0b9bbee@suse.de>

> > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> > index 750e779c23db..323a8e169581 100644
> > --- a/mm/filemap.c
> > +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> > @@ -2479,14 +2479,16 @@ static int filemap_get_pages(struct kiocb *iocb, size_t count,
> >   {
> >   	struct file *filp = iocb->ki_filp;
> >   	struct address_space *mapping = filp->f_mapping;
> > +	unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
> >   	struct file_ra_state *ra = &filp->f_ra;
> > -	pgoff_t index = iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +	pgoff_t index = round_down(iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT, min_nrpages);
> >   	pgoff_t last_index;
> >   	struct folio *folio;
> >   	int err = 0;
> >   	/* "last_index" is the index of the page beyond the end of the read */
> >   	last_index = DIV_ROUND_UP(iocb->ki_pos + count, PAGE_SIZE);
> > +	last_index = round_up(last_index, min_nrpages);
> 
> Huh? 'last_index' is unset here; sure you mean 'iocb->ki_pos + count' ?
> 
> And what's the rationale to replace 'DIV_ROUND_UP' with 'round_up' ?

Actually we are not replacing DIV_ROUND_UP, we are just adding another
round_up operation to min_nrpages pages after we get the last_index by
converting the bytes to page count. The main idea is to align the
last_index to min_order, if it is set. AFAIK, there is no one helper
that can do both lines in one shot.

> 
> >   retry:
> >   	if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> >   		return -EINTR;


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-13 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-13  9:36 [RFC v2 00/14] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 01/14] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 12:03   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:05     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 21:29       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 19:00         ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-15 10:34           ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-14 18:49   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-15 10:21     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 02/14] filemap: align the index to mapping_min_order in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 12:20   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 21:13     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2024-02-13 22:00   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 03/14] filemap: use mapping_min_order while allocating folios Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 14:58   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 22:05   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 10:13     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 04/14] readahead: set file_ra_state->ra_pages to be at least mapping_min_order Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 14:59   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 22:09   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 13:32     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-14 13:53       ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 05/14] readahead: align index to mapping_min_order in ondemand_ra and force_ra Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:00   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 22:29   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 15:10     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 06/14] readahead: rework loop in page_cache_ra_unbounded() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 07/14] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in ra_(unbounded|order) Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:01   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 08/14] mm: do not split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:02   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 09/14] mm: Support order-1 folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:03   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 10/14] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 15:06   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-13 16:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:27     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 21:30       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 15:13         ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 11/14] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:27   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:32     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 12/14] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:48     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 22:44       ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 15:51         ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 13/14] xfs: add an experimental CONFIG_XFS_LBS option Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:39   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-13 21:19   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-13 21:54     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 22:45       ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-13  9:37 ` [RFC v2 14/14] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 16:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-14 16:40     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-13 21:34   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-14 16:35     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-02-15 22:17       ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=zjxq2so7fx3di7pa57nymko2cvfe7ugg6qtxasqbb6ziupy5ye@q4f6kddng5ro \
    --to=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox