linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	 brauner@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	hare@suse.de,  djwong@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] fs/buffer: use sleeping version of __find_get_block()
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:33:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <z6bgilhyxp77u2v75aaw3ep5hzhdrf6jwgeholt74vvkozszrf@m2up5a3q6cx5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415231635.83960-4-dave@stgolabs.net>

On Tue 15-04-25 16:16:31, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Convert to the new nonatomic flavor to benefit from potential performance
> benefits and adapt in the future vs migration such that semantics
> are kept.
> 
> Convert write_boundary_block() which already takes the buffer
> lock as well as bdev_getblk() depending on the respective gpf flags.
> There are no changes in semantics.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/buffer.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 64034638ee2c..f8e63885604b 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -658,7 +658,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_buffers_fsync);
>  void write_boundary_block(struct block_device *bdev,
>  			sector_t bblock, unsigned blocksize)
>  {
> -	struct buffer_head *bh = __find_get_block(bdev, bblock + 1, blocksize);
> +	struct buffer_head *bh;
> +
> +	bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, bblock + 1, blocksize);
>  	if (bh) {
>  		if (buffer_dirty(bh))
>  			write_dirty_buffer(bh, 0);
> @@ -1440,8 +1442,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__find_get_block_nonatomic);
>  struct buffer_head *bdev_getblk(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
>  		unsigned size, gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> -	struct buffer_head *bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
> +	struct buffer_head *bh;
> +
> +	if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
> +		bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, block, size);
> +	else
> +		bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
>  
>  	might_alloc(gfp);
>  	if (bh)
> --
> 2.39.5
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-16  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-15 23:16 [PATCH -next 0/7] fs/buffer: split pagecache lookups into atomic or blocking Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs/buffer: split locking for pagecache lookups Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:32   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs/buffer: introduce sleeping flavors " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:33   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs/buffer: use sleeping version of __find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:33   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] fs/ocfs2: " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:35   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:38   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs/ext4: use sleeping version of sb_find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:39   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/migrate: fix sleep in atomic for large folios and buffer heads Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:43   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-16 19:27 ` [PATCH -next 0/7] fs/buffer: split pagecache lookups into atomic or blocking Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-17  9:57   ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-22 11:25   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-17  9:58 ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-18  1:59 [PATCH v2 " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-18  1:59 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs/buffer: use sleeping version of __find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=z6bgilhyxp77u2v75aaw3ep5hzhdrf6jwgeholt74vvkozszrf@m2up5a3q6cx5 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox