From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: A possible winner in pre7-8 References: <3917C33F.1FA1BAD4@sgi.com> From: "Juan J. Quintela" In-Reply-To: "Juan J. Quintela"'s message of "09 May 2000 19:33:27 +0200" Date: 10 May 2000 05:29:48 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: >>>>> "juan" == Juan J Quintela writes: Hi juan> No way, here my tests run two iterations, and in the second iteration juan> init was killed, and the system become unresponsive (headless machine, juan> you know....). I have no time now to do a more detailed report, more juan> information later today. I have been checking today pre7-8 + manfred patch. (test as always while (true); do time ./mmap002; done). Things have improved a lot from pre7-6, but they are not perfect. With that patch I have obtained the following times: real 2m41.772s user 0m16.610s sys 0m12.470s (this is a typical value, there are fluctuations between 2m35 and 2m54). It begin to kill processes after the 10th iteration. After that, the machine freezes. The results for pre7-8 + manfred patch + andrea classzone 27 is real 2m7.622s user 0m15.480s sys 0m8.240s (almost no variations between runs +-1second). And it is rock solid here, no freezes at all. The results for 2.2.15 are: real 1m57.619s user 0m16.320s sys 0m11.820s but it kills processes after 10/12 iterations. I hope this helps. Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/