From: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/slab: drop the OBJEXTS_NOSPIN_ALLOC flag from enum objext_flags
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 16:57:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ym376ht2w32x3zmfpteiezo6goelaiokvk6ujgp4imdwpw6o2s@tz2f5hvm3ezs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260210044642.139482-3-harry.yoo@oracle.com>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 01:46:42PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
> OBJEXTS_NOSPIN_ALLOC was used to remember whether a slabobj_ext vector
> was allocated via kmalloc_nolock(), so that free_slab_obj_exts() could
> call kfree_nolock() instead of kfree().
>
> Now that kfree() supports freeing kmalloc_nolock() objects, this flag is
> no longer needed. Instead, pass the allow_spin parameter down to
> free_slab_obj_exts() to determine whether kfree_nolock() or kfree()
> should be called in the free path, and free one bit in
> enum objext_flags.
>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 3 +--
> mm/slub.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 0651865a4564..bb789ec4a2a2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -359,8 +359,7 @@ enum objext_flags {
> * MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS.
> */
> OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL = __OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL,
> - /* slabobj_ext vector allocated with kmalloc_nolock() */
> - OBJEXTS_NOSPIN_ALLOC = __FIRST_OBJEXT_FLAG,
> + __OBJEXTS_FLAG_UNUSED = __FIRST_OBJEXT_FLAG,
> /* the next bit after the last actual flag */
> __NR_OBJEXTS_FLAGS = (__FIRST_OBJEXT_FLAG << 1),
> };
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 63b03fd62ca7..a73a80b33ff9 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2189,8 +2189,6 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
> virt_to_slab(vec)->slab_cache == s);
>
> new_exts = (unsigned long)vec;
> - if (unlikely(!allow_spin))
> - new_exts |= OBJEXTS_NOSPIN_ALLOC;
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> new_exts |= MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS;
> #endif
> @@ -2228,7 +2226,7 @@ int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
> +static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, bool allow_spin)
> {
> struct slabobj_ext *obj_exts;
>
> @@ -2256,10 +2254,10 @@ static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
> * the extension for obj_exts is expected to be NULL.
> */
> mark_objexts_empty(obj_exts);
> - if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(slab->obj_exts) & OBJEXTS_NOSPIN_ALLOC))
> - kfree_nolock(obj_exts);
> - else
> + if (allow_spin)
> kfree(obj_exts);
> + else
> + kfree_nolock(obj_exts);
Looks good to me.
One small observation from my side: at first glance I briefly wondered if we
could ever allocate in an allow_spin=true context but free in an
allow_spin=false context, potentially resulting in a kmalloc() -> kfree_nolock()
mismatch.
After taking a closer look, the only case where "free_new_slab_nolock() -> ...
-> free_slab_obj_exts()" runs with allow_spin=false is along the "___slab_alloc
-> alloc_single_from_new_slab()/alloc_from_new_slab()" path. In that scenario,
alloc_slab_obj_exts() is also called under allow_spin=false and uses
kmalloc_nolock(), so the allocation/free paths remain consistent. So "kmalloc()
-> kfree_nolock()" case can't happen, and the code looks solid to me!
Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
> slab->obj_exts = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2323,7 +2321,7 @@ static int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
> +static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, bool allow_spin)
> {
> }
>
> @@ -3387,14 +3385,14 @@ static __always_inline void account_slab(struct slab *slab, int order,
> }
>
> static __always_inline void unaccount_slab(struct slab *slab, int order,
> - struct kmem_cache *s)
> + struct kmem_cache *s, bool allow_spin)
> {
> /*
> * The slab object extensions should now be freed regardless of
> * whether mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() or not because profiling
> * might have been disabled after slab->obj_exts got allocated.
> */
> - free_slab_obj_exts(slab);
> + free_slab_obj_exts(slab, allow_spin);
>
> mod_node_page_state(slab_pgdat(slab), cache_vmstat_idx(s),
> -(PAGE_SIZE << order));
> @@ -3498,7 +3496,7 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, bool allow_spin
> page->mapping = NULL;
> __ClearPageSlab(page);
> mm_account_reclaimed_pages(pages);
> - unaccount_slab(slab, order, s);
> + unaccount_slab(slab, order, s, allow_spin);
> if (allow_spin)
> free_frozen_pages(page, order);
> else
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-10 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 4:46 [PATCH V2 0/2] mm/slab: support kmalloc_nolock() -> kfree[_rcu]() Harry Yoo
2026-02-10 4:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/slab: allow freeing kmalloc_nolock()'d objects using kfree[_rcu]() Harry Yoo
2026-02-10 4:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/slab: drop the OBJEXTS_NOSPIN_ALLOC flag from enum objext_flags Harry Yoo
2026-02-10 8:57 ` Hao Li [this message]
2026-02-10 10:32 ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-10 14:08 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] mm/slab: support kmalloc_nolock() -> kfree[_rcu]() Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ym376ht2w32x3zmfpteiezo6goelaiokvk6ujgp4imdwpw6o2s@tz2f5hvm3ezs \
--to=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox