From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: handle overflow in mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:33:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xr93y667lgdm.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110126170713.GA2401@cmpxchg.org> (Johannes Weiner's message of "Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:07:13 +0100")
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:29:15AM -0800, Greg Thelen wrote:
>> mem_cgroup_get_limit() returns a byte limit as a unsigned 64 bit value,
>> which is converted to a page count by mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(). Prior
>> to this patch the conversion could overflow on 32 bit platforms
>> yielding a limit of zero.
>
> Balbir: It can truncate, because the conversion shrinks the required
> bits of this 64-bit number by only PAGE_SHIFT (12). Trying to store
> the resulting up to 52 significant bits in a 32-bit integer will cut
> up to 20 significant bits off.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
>> ---
>> mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> index 7dcca55..3fcac51 100644
>> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
>> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> struct task_struct *p;
>>
>> check_panic_on_oom(CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, gfp_mask, 0, NULL);
>> - limit = mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + limit = min(mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT, (u64)ULONG_MAX);
>
> I would much prefer using min_t(u64, ...). To make it really, really
> explicit that this is 64-bit arithmetic. But that is just me, no
> correctness issue.
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
I agree that min_t() is clearer. Does the following look better?
Author: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Date: Wed Jan 26 00:05:59 2011 -0800
oom: handle truncation in mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
mem_cgroup_get_limit() returns a byte limit as an unsigned 64 bit value.
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() converts this byte limit to an unsigned long
page count. Prior to this patch, the 32 bit version of
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() would silently truncate the most significant
20 bits from byte limit when constructing the limit as a page count.
For byte limits with the lowest 44 bits set to zero, this truncation
would compute a page limit of zero.
This patch checks for such large byte limits that cannot be converted to
page counts without loosing information. In such situations, where a 32
bit page counter is too small to represent the corresponding byte count,
select a maximal page count.
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 7dcca55..0164060 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *mem, gfp_t gfp_mask)
struct task_struct *p;
check_panic_on_oom(CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, gfp_mask, 0, NULL);
- limit = mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ limit = min_t(u64, mem_cgroup_get_limit(mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT, ULONG_MAX);
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
retry:
p = select_bad_process(&points, limit, mem, NULL);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 8:29 Greg Thelen
2011-01-26 13:40 ` Balbir Singh
2011-01-26 17:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-01-26 17:33 ` Greg Thelen [this message]
2011-01-26 18:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-01-26 20:32 ` Greg Thelen
2011-01-26 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-27 0:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 0:53 ` [BUGFIX] memcg: fix res_counter_read_u64 lock aware (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 1:08 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-27 1:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 1:55 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-27 1:43 ` [BUGFIX v2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 1:57 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-27 2:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-27 0:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xr93y667lgdm.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox