linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: Control page reclaim granularity
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:39:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xr93haxzo59m.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120308073412.GA6975@gmail.com> (Zheng Liu's message of "Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:34:13 +0800")

Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi list,
>
> Recently we encounter a problem about page reclaim.  I abstract it in here.
> The problem is that there are two different file types.  One is small index
> file, and another is large data file.  The index file is mmaped into memory,
> and application hope that they can be kept in memory and don't be reclaimed
> too frequently.  The data file is manipulted by read/write, and they should
> be reclaimed more frequently than the index file.
>
> As previously discussion [1], Konstantin suggest me to mmap index file with
> PROT_EXEC flag.  Meanwhile he provides a patch to set a flag in mm_flags to
> increase the priority of mmaped file pages.  However, these solutions are
> not perfect.  I review the related patches (8cab4754 and c909e993) and I
> think that mmaped index file with PROT_EXEC flag is too tricky.  From the
> view of applicaton programmer, index file is a regular file that stores
> some data.  So they should be mmap with PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE rather than
> with PROT_EXEC.  As commit log said (8cab4754), the purpose of this patch
> is to keep executable code in memory to improve the response of application.
> In addition, Kongstantin's patch needs to adjust the application program.
> So in some cases, we cannot touch the code of application, and this patch is
> useless.
>
> I have discussed with Kongstantin about this problem and we think maybe
> kernel should provide some mechanism.  For example, user can set memory
> pressure priorities for vma or inode, or mmaped pages and file pages can be
> reclaimed separately.  If someone has thought about it, please let me know.
> Any feedbacks are welcomed.  Thank you.
>
> Previously discussion:
> 1. http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=132947026019538&w=2
>
> Regards,
> Zheng

It's not exactly the same approach, but we have toyed with the idea of
charging different inodes to different cgroups.  Each cgroup would have
different soft/hard limits to allow for different cache behavior.

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg06006.html

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-08  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-08  7:34 Zheng Liu
2012-03-08  8:39 ` Greg Thelen [this message]
2012-03-08 16:13   ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-08 16:32     ` Zhu Yanhai
2012-03-14  7:19     ` Greg Thelen
2012-03-08  9:35 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-08 16:54   ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-12  0:28     ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-12  2:06       ` Fwd: " Zheng Liu
2012-03-12  5:19         ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-12  6:20           ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-12  8:14             ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-12 13:42               ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-12 14:18                 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-13  2:48                   ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-13  4:37                     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-13  5:00                       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-13  6:30                     ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13  6:48                       ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13  7:21                         ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-13  7:43                           ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13  7:47                             ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13  8:05                               ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13  8:04                                 ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13  8:08                                   ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13  8:28                                     ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13  8:36                                       ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13  9:03                                         ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-12 15:15                 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13  2:51                   ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-12 14:55   ` Rik van Riel
2012-03-13  2:57     ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-13 14:57       ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xr93haxzo59m.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox