From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: Control page reclaim granularity
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:39:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xr93haxzo59m.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120308073412.GA6975@gmail.com> (Zheng Liu's message of "Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:34:13 +0800")
Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi list,
>
> Recently we encounter a problem about page reclaim. I abstract it in here.
> The problem is that there are two different file types. One is small index
> file, and another is large data file. The index file is mmaped into memory,
> and application hope that they can be kept in memory and don't be reclaimed
> too frequently. The data file is manipulted by read/write, and they should
> be reclaimed more frequently than the index file.
>
> As previously discussion [1], Konstantin suggest me to mmap index file with
> PROT_EXEC flag. Meanwhile he provides a patch to set a flag in mm_flags to
> increase the priority of mmaped file pages. However, these solutions are
> not perfect. I review the related patches (8cab4754 and c909e993) and I
> think that mmaped index file with PROT_EXEC flag is too tricky. From the
> view of applicaton programmer, index file is a regular file that stores
> some data. So they should be mmap with PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE rather than
> with PROT_EXEC. As commit log said (8cab4754), the purpose of this patch
> is to keep executable code in memory to improve the response of application.
> In addition, Kongstantin's patch needs to adjust the application program.
> So in some cases, we cannot touch the code of application, and this patch is
> useless.
>
> I have discussed with Kongstantin about this problem and we think maybe
> kernel should provide some mechanism. For example, user can set memory
> pressure priorities for vma or inode, or mmaped pages and file pages can be
> reclaimed separately. If someone has thought about it, please let me know.
> Any feedbacks are welcomed. Thank you.
>
> Previously discussion:
> 1. http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=132947026019538&w=2
>
> Regards,
> Zheng
It's not exactly the same approach, but we have toyed with the idea of
charging different inodes to different cgroups. Each cgroup would have
different soft/hard limits to allow for different cache behavior.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg06006.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-08 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-08 7:34 Zheng Liu
2012-03-08 8:39 ` Greg Thelen [this message]
2012-03-08 16:13 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-08 16:32 ` Zhu Yanhai
2012-03-14 7:19 ` Greg Thelen
2012-03-08 9:35 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-08 16:54 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-12 0:28 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-12 2:06 ` Fwd: " Zheng Liu
2012-03-12 5:19 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-12 6:20 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-12 8:14 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-12 13:42 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-12 14:18 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-13 2:48 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-13 4:37 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-13 5:00 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-13 6:30 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13 6:48 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13 7:21 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-13 7:43 ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13 7:47 ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13 8:05 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13 8:04 ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13 8:08 ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13 8:28 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13 8:36 ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-13 9:03 ` Kautuk Consul
2012-03-12 15:15 ` Zheng Liu
2012-03-13 2:51 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-12 14:55 ` Rik van Riel
2012-03-13 2:57 ` Minchan Kim
2012-03-13 14:57 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xr93haxzo59m.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox