From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@samsung.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
t.stanislaws@samsung.com, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/page_alloc: fix incorrect isolation behavior by rechecking migratetype
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:14:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xa1toasxo2o3.fsf@mina86.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414051821-12769-2-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
On Thu, Oct 23 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> There are two paths to reach core free function of buddy allocator,
> __free_one_page(), one is free_one_page()->__free_one_page() and the
> other is free_hot_cold_page()->free_pcppages_bulk()->__free_one_page().
> Each paths has race condition causing serious problems. At first, this
> patch is focused on first type of freepath. And then, following patch
> will solve the problem in second type of freepath.
>
> In the first type of freepath, we got migratetype of freeing page without
> holding the zone lock, so it could be racy. There are two cases of this
> race.
>
> 1. pages are added to isolate buddy list after restoring orignal
> migratetype
>
> CPU1 CPU2
>
> get migratetype => return MIGRATE_ISOLATE
> call free_one_page() with MIGRATE_ISOLATE
>
> grab the zone lock
> unisolate pageblock
> release the zone lock
>
> grab the zone lock
> call __free_one_page() with MIGRATE_ISOLATE
> freepage go into isolate buddy list,
> although pageblock is already unisolated
>
> This may cause two problems. One is that we can't use this page anymore
> until next isolation attempt of this pageblock, because freepage is on
> isolate buddy list. The other is that freepage accouting could be wrong
> due to merging between different buddy list. Freepages on isolate buddy
> list aren't counted as freepage, but ones on normal buddy list are counted
> as freepage. If merge happens, buddy freepage on normal buddy list is
> inevitably moved to isolate buddy list without any consideration of
> freepage accouting so it could be incorrect.
>
> 2. pages are added to normal buddy list while pageblock is isolated.
> It is similar with above case.
>
> This also may cause two problems. One is that we can't keep these
> freepages from being allocated. Although this pageblock is isolated,
> freepage would be added to normal buddy list so that it could be
> allocated without any restriction. And the other problem is same as
> case 1, that it, incorrect freepage accouting.
>
> This race condition would be prevented by checking migratetype again
> with holding the zone lock. Because it is somewhat heavy operation
> and it isn't needed in common case, we want to avoid rechecking as much
> as possible. So this patch introduce new variable, nr_isolate_pageblock
> in struct zone to check if there is isolated pageblock.
> With this, we can avoid to re-check migratetype in common case and do
> it only if there is isolated pageblock or migratetype is MIGRATE_ISOLATE.
> This solve above mentioned problems.
>
> Changes from v3:
> Add one more check in free_one_page() that checks whether migratetype is
> MIGRATE_ISOLATE or not. Without this, abovementioned case 1 could happens.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/page-isolation.h | 8 ++++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 11 +++++++++--
> mm/page_isolation.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@google.com>--<xmpp:mina86@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-27 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-23 8:10 [PATCH v4 0/4] fix freepage count problems in memory isolation Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-23 8:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/page_alloc: fix incorrect isolation behavior by rechecking migratetype Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-27 10:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-28 7:22 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-27 17:14 ` Michal Nazarewicz [this message]
2014-10-23 8:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/page_alloc: add freepage on isolate pageblock to correct buddy list Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-27 10:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-27 17:14 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-10-23 8:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/page_alloc: move migratetype recheck logic to __free_one_page() Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-27 10:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-10-28 7:37 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-23 8:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-24 2:27 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] fix freepage count problems in memory isolation Minchan Kim
2014-10-24 5:36 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-24 8:26 ` Gioh Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xa1toasxo2o3.fsf@mina86.com \
--to=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=gioh.kim@lge.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=heesub.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.stanislaws@samsung.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox