From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+c0f0941337ade4c26ed1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
peili.dev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] possible deadlock in mmap_read_lock
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 21:39:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <v6jvhxxb2t7dh5ox6feqvc3xnlkgjwrdofkxodmg3t4rrtew2u@hxghrcqhk2n4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000000000000d8474e061d9f28be@google.com>
* syzbot <syzbot+c0f0941337ade4c26ed1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> [240719 16:01]:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
This bug doesn't exist anymore.
>
> HEAD commit: 3fe121b62282 Add linux-next specific files for 20240712
> git tree: linux-next
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1769e695980000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=98dd8c4bab5cdce
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c0f0941337ade4c26ed1
> compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8c6fbf69718d/disk-3fe121b6.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/39fc7e43dfc1/vmlinux-3fe121b6.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/0a78e70e4b4e/bzImage-3fe121b6.xz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+c0f0941337ade4c26ed1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>
>
> ============================================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 6.10.0-rc7-next-20240712-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> mount/4518 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff88801d2b1498 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_read_lock+0x1c/0x60 include/linux/mmap_lock.h:144
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88801d2b1498 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_read_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:144 [inline]
> ffff88801d2b1498 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: exit_mmap+0x159/0xc80 mm/mmap.c:3396
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
> lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> 1 lock held by mount/4518:
> #0: ffff88801d2b1498 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_read_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:144 [inline]
> #0: ffff88801d2b1498 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: exit_mmap+0x159/0xc80 mm/mmap.c:3396
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 4518 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-next-20240712-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
> print_deadlock_bug+0x483/0x620 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3034
> check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3086 [inline]
> validate_chain+0x15e2/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3888
> __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5199
> lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5822
> down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
> mmap_read_lock+0x1c/0x60 include/linux/mmap_lock.h:144
> unmap_single_vma+0x2a0/0x330 mm/memory.c:1832
> unmap_vmas+0x3cc/0x5f0 mm/memory.c:1904
> exit_mmap+0x264/0xc80 mm/mmap.c:3412
> __mmput+0x115/0x390 kernel/fork.c:1347
> exit_mm+0x220/0x310 kernel/exit.c:571
This is discussed here [1]. There is some case where unmap_single_vma()
was reached without the lock held in write mode and the flag seems to
have been misunderstood.
[1.] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240710-bug12-v1-1-0e5440f9b8d3@gmail.com/
Thanks,
Liam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-20 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 20:01 syzbot
2024-07-20 1:39 ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=v6jvhxxb2t7dh5ox6feqvc3xnlkgjwrdofkxodmg3t4rrtew2u@hxghrcqhk2n4 \
--to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=peili.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+c0f0941337ade4c26ed1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox