From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/vmscan: Add retry logic for cgroups with memory.low in kswapd
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 16:09:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <v56ql5ptxyx4x2j7nffznhs3osjghkoj3dlkfbpohotuof3yiv@gf74er4pf34v> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQ3yhmsT2NHeNwLi@tiehlicka>
On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 02:22:14PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Sorry for late reply.
>
> On Mon 20-10-25 10:11:23, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> [...]
> > To provide more context about our specific setup:
> >
> > 1. The memory.low values set on host pods are actually quite large,
> > some pods are set to 10GB, others to 20GB, etc.
> > 2. Since most pods have memory limits configured, each time kswapd
> > is woken up, if a pod's memory usage hasn't exceeded its own
> > memory.low, its memory won't be reclaimed.
> > 3. When applications start up, rapidly consume memory, or experience
> > network traffic bursts, the kernel reaches steal_suitable_fallback(),
> > which sets watermark_boost and subsequently wakes kswapd.
> > 4. In the core logic of kswapd thread (balance_pgdat()), when reclaim is
> > triggered by watermark_boost, the maximum priority is 10. Higher priority
> > values mean less aggressive LRU scanning, which can result in no pages
> > being reclaimed during a single scan cycle:
> >
> > if (nr_boost_reclaim && sc.priority == DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
> > raise_priority = false;
> >
> > 5. This eventually causes pgdat->kswapd_failures to continuously accumulate,
> > exceeding MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES, and consequently kswapd stops working.
> > At this point, the system's available memory is still significantly above
> > the high watermark—it's inappropriate for kswapd to stop under these
> > conditions.
> >
> > The final observable issue is that a brief period of rapid memory allocation
> > causes kswapd to stop running, ultimately triggering direct reclaim and
> > making the applications unresponsive.
>
> This to me sounds like something to be addressed in the watermark
> boosting code. I do not think we should be breaching low limit for that
> (opportunistic) reclaim.
Jiayuan already posted v2 with different approach. We can move the
discussion there.
http://lore.kernel.org/20251024022711.382238-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-08 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 8:18 Jiayuan Chen
2025-10-14 9:33 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-14 12:56 ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-10-16 14:49 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-16 15:10 ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-10-16 18:43 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-20 10:11 ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-11-07 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-08 0:09 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=v56ql5ptxyx4x2j7nffznhs3osjghkoj3dlkfbpohotuof3yiv@gf74er4pf34v \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox