Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] zram: introduce writeback bio batching support

[Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>]

On (25/11/14 10:53), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > > +struct zram_wb_req {
> > > +	unsigned long blk_idx;
> > > +	struct page *page;
> > >  	struct zram_pp_slot *pps;
> > >  	struct bio_vec bio_vec;
> > >  	struct bio bio;
> > > -	int ret = 0, err;
> > > +
> > > +	struct list_head entry;
> > > +};
> > 
> > How about moving structure definition to the upper part of the C file?
> > Not only readability to put together data types but also better diff
> > for reviewer to know what we changed in this patch.
> 
> This still needs to be under #ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK so readability
> is not significantly better.  Do you still prefer moving it up?

My intention was to keep structs definitions together with the static
functions that use them (which are under big #ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK
block).  So that CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK parts stay in one place and are not
scattered across the file.