From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/18] zsmalloc: make zspage lock preemptible
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 21:29:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uuejsxdilozxhallkev5tspm6kfpe47lgkoonlubnauwj4ckvm@iui2n2g56cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213113248.2225-1-hdanton@sina.com>
On (25/02/13 19:32), Hillf Danton wrote:
[..]
> > +static void zspage_read_lock(struct zspage *zspage)
> > +{
> > + atomic_t *lock = &zspage->lock;
> > + int old = atomic_read_acquire(lock);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> > + rwsem_acquire_read(&zspage->lockdep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + do {
> > + if (old == ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED) {
> > + cpu_relax();
> > + old = atomic_read_acquire(lock);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, &old, old + 1));
>
> Given mcs_spinlock, inventing spinlock in 2025 sounds no good.
> See below for the spinlock version.
I should have sent this series in 2024, when inventing a spinlock
sounded good :)
> struct zspage_lock {
> spinlock_t lock;
> int cnt;
> struct lockdep_map lockdep_map;
> };
>
> static __must_check bool zspage_write_trylock(struct zspage_lock *zl)
> {
> spin_lock(&zl->lock);
> if (zl->cnt == ZS_PAGE_UNLOCKED) {
> // zl->cnt = ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED;
> rwsem_acquire(&zl->lockdep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
> return true;
> }
> spin_unlock(&zl->lock);
> return false;
> }
>
> static void zspage_write_unlock(struct zspage_lock *zl)
> {
> rwsem_release(&zl->lockdep_map, _RET_IP_);
> spin_unlock(&zl->lock);
> }
>
> static void zspage_read_lock(struct zspage_lock *zl)
> {
> rwsem_acquire_read(&zl->lockdep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
>
> spin_lock(&zl->lock);
> zl->cnt++;
> spin_unlock(&zl->lock);
> }
>
> static void zspage_read_unlock(struct zspage_lock *zl)
> {
> rwsem_release(&zl->lockdep_map, _RET_IP_);
>
> spin_lock(&zl->lock);
> zl->cnt--;
> spin_unlock(&zl->lock);
> }
I see, yeah I can pick it up, thanks. A couple of *minor* things I can
think of. First. in the current implementation I also track LOCK_STAT
(lock-contended/lock-acquired), something like
static inline void __read_lock(struct zspage *zspage)
{
atomic_t *lock = &zspage->lock;
int old = atomic_read_acquire(lock);
rwsem_acquire_read(&zspage->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
do {
if (old == ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED) {
lock_contended(&zspage->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
cpu_relax();
old = atomic_read_acquire(lock);
continue;
}
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, &old, old + 1));
lock_acquired(&zspage->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
}
I'll add lock-stat to zsl, but it's worth mentioning that zsl "splits"
the stats into zsl spin-lock's dep_map and zsl's own dep_map:
class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg
zspage->lock-R: 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 2 6.19 11.61 17.80 8.90
&zspage->zsl.lock: 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5457 1330106 0.10 118.53 174917.46 0.13
That is, quite likely, fine. One can just add the numbers, I assume.
Second, we'll be carrying around two dep_map-s per-zsl in lockdep builds
now, but, again, that is, likely, not a problem as sizeof(lockdep_map)
isn't too huge (around 48 bytes).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 6:26 [PATCH v5 00/18] zsmalloc/zram: there be preemption Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:26 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] zram: sleepable entry locking Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
2025-02-13 0:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13 1:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13 8:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] zram: permit preemption with active compression stream Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 16:01 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13 1:04 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] zram: remove crypto include Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 16:13 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13 0:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] zram: remove max_comp_streams device attr Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] zram: remove two-staged handle allocation Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] zram: remove writestall zram_stats member Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] zram: limit max recompress prio to num_active_comps Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] zram: filter out recomp targets based on priority Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] zram: rework recompression loop Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] zsmalloc: factor out pool locking helpers Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 16:18 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-12 16:19 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13 0:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13 1:12 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13 2:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] zsmalloc: factor out size-class " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] zsmalloc: make zspage lock preemptible Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 17:14 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13 1:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13 1:31 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13 1:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13 11:32 ` Hillf Danton
2025-02-13 12:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] zsmalloc: introduce new object mapping API Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] zram: switch to new zsmalloc " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] zram: permit reclaim in zstd custom allocator Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] zram: do not leak page on recompress_store error path Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] zram: do not leak page on writeback_store " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 6:27 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] zram: add might_sleep to zcomp API Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13 0:09 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] zsmalloc/zram: there be preemption Andrew Morton
2025-02-13 0:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uuejsxdilozxhallkev5tspm6kfpe47lgkoonlubnauwj4ckvm@iui2n2g56cat \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox