linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] kmemleak: Allow partial freeing of memory blocks
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:42:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tnxtz1ovq8p.fsf@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246950733.24285.10.camel@penberg-laptop> (Pekka Enberg's message of "Tue\, 07 Jul 2009 10\:12\:13 +0300")

Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 11:51 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> @@ -552,8 +558,29 @@ static void delete_object(unsigned long ptr)
>>  	 */
>>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&object->lock, flags);
>>  	object->flags &= ~OBJECT_ALLOCATED;
>> +	start = object->pointer;
>> +	end = object->pointer + object->size;
>> +	min_count = object->min_count;
>>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&object->lock, flags);
>>  	put_object(object);
>> +
>> +	if (!size)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Partial freeing. Just create one or two objects that may result
>> +	 * from the memory block split.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (in_atomic())
>> +		gfp_flags = GFP_ATOMIC;
>> +	else
>> +		gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL;
>
> Are you sure we can do this? There's a big fat comment on top of
> in_atomic() that suggest this is not safe.

It's not safe but I thought it's slightly better than not checking it.

> Why do we need to create the
> object here anyway and not in the _alloc_ paths where gfp flags are
> explicitly passed?

That's the free_bootmem case where Linux can only partially free a
block previously allocated with alloc_bootmem (that's why I haven't
tracked this from the beginning). So if it only frees some part in the
middle of a block, I would have to create two separate
kmemleak_objects (well, I can reuse one but I preferred fewer
modifications as this is not on a fast path anyway).

In the tests I did, free_bootmem is called before the slab allocator
is initialised and therefore before kmemleak is initialised, which
means that the requests are just logged and the kmemleak_* functions
are called later from the kmemleak_init() function. All allocations
via this function are fine to only use GFP_KERNEL.

If my reasoning above is correct, I'll only pass GFP_KERNEL and add a
comment in the code clarifying when the partial freeing happen.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-07  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-06 10:51 [RFC PATCH 0/3] kmemleak: Add support for the bootmem allocator Catalin Marinas
2009-07-06 10:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] kmemleak: Allow partial freeing of memory blocks Catalin Marinas
2009-07-07  7:12   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-07  8:42     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2009-07-07 13:39       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-08  6:40         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-08  9:42           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-08  9:45             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-06 10:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] kmemleak: Add callbacks to the bootmem allocator Catalin Marinas
2009-07-06 10:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-07  7:08   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-07 16:53     ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-07 22:09       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-08  6:48         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-08  9:43           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-08 11:46             ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-08  9:46         ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-08 10:02           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-08 10:03             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-06 10:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] kmemleak: Remove alloc_bootmem annotations introduced in the past Catalin Marinas
2009-07-07  7:12   ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tnxtz1ovq8p.fsf@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox