From: wujing <realwujing@qq.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>,
wujing <realwujing@qq.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] mm/page_alloc: dynamic watermark boosting
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 19:59:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_DEB3B993C801A1D507C53976DEA7F6940D05@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_C5AD9528AAB1853E24A7DC98A19D700E3808@qq.com>
This is v3 of the auto-tuning patch, addressing feedback from Vlastimil Babka,
Andrew Morton, and Matthew Wilcox.
Major shift in v3:
Following Vlastimil's suggestion, this version abandons the direct modification
of min_free_kbytes. Instead, it leverages the existing watermark_boost
infrastructure. This approach is more idiomatic as it:
- Avoids conflicts with administrative sysctl settings.
- Only affects specific zones experiencing pressure.
- Utilizes standard kswapd logic for natural decay after reclamation.
Responses to Vlastimil Babka's feedback:
> "Were they really packet drops observed? AFAIK the receive is deferred to non-irq
> context if those atomic allocations fail, it shouldn't mean a drop."
In our high-concurrency production environment, we observed that while the
network stack tries to defer processing, persistent GFP_ATOMIC failures
eventually lead to NIC-level drops due to RX buffer exhaustion.
> "As for the implementation I'd rather not be changing min_free_kbytes directly...
> We already have watermark_boost to dynamically change watermarks"
Agreed and implemented in v3.
Changes in v3:
- Replaced min_free_kbytes modification with watermark_boost calls.
- Removed all complex decay/persistence logic from v2, relying on kswapd's
standard behavior.
- Maintained the 10-second debounce mechanism.
- Engaged netdev@ community as requested by Andrew Morton.
Thanks for the thoughtful reviews!
wujing (1):
mm/page_alloc: auto-tune watermarks on atomic allocation failure
mm/page_alloc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-04 12:23 [PATCH 0/1] mm/page_alloc: dynamic min_free_kbytes adjustment wujing
2026-01-04 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] mm/page_alloc: auto-tune min_free_kbytes on atomic allocation failure wujing
2026-01-04 18:14 ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-05 2:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-01-05 6:38 ` Lance Yang
2026-01-05 7:29 ` wujing
2026-01-05 16:47 ` Michal Hocko
2026-01-05 8:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] mm/page_alloc: dynamic min_free_kbytes adjustment wujing
2026-01-05 11:59 ` wujing [this message]
[not found] ` <20260105115943.1361645-1-realwujing@qq.com>
2026-01-05 11:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] mm/page_alloc: auto-tune watermarks on atomic allocation failure wujing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_DEB3B993C801A1D507C53976DEA7F6940D05@qq.com \
--to=realwujing@qq.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox