From: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
To: syzbot+c473aa669b5e8a6f48d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, peterx@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH next] userfaultfd: unassigned vma leads to a potential unreleased locks
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:11:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_C43C1BB425D6BA16BB6533FC9E001BC64B08@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69b6fc68.a00a0220.3b25d1.001e.GAE@google.com>
A deadlock [1] occurs in mfill_get_vma() because the locks mmap_lock
and map_changing_lock are not released; the failure to release them
properly stems from the assignment of the vma variable occurring at
an inappropriate stage.
Moving the vma assignment operation within mfill_get_vma() to after
the vma has been got.
[1]
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.17/5990 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88802caef3b8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: __might_fault+0xaf/0x130 mm/memory.c:7249
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807cdbccf0 (&ctx->map_changing_lock){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: mfill_get_vma+0x162/0x660 mm/userfaultfd.c:226
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&ctx->map_changing_lock){.+.+}-{4:4}:
down_read+0x47/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1568
mfill_get_vma+0x162/0x660 mm/userfaultfd.c:226
mfill_atomic mm/userfaultfd.c:900 [inline]
mfill_atomic_continue+0x189/0x12c0 mm/userfaultfd.c:974
userfaultfd_continue fs/userfaultfd.c:1806 [inline]
userfaultfd_ioctl+0x232d/0x4c70 fs/userfaultfd.c:2071
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:583
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x14d/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (vm_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
__vma_start_exclude_readers+0x28a/0x940 mm/mmap_lock.c:125
__vma_start_write+0xdc/0x290 mm/mmap_lock.c:148
vma_start_write include/linux/mmap_lock.h:303 [inline]
mprotect_fixup+0x5eb/0xa80 mm/mprotect.c:768
setup_arg_pages+0x565/0xac0 fs/exec.c:670
load_elf_binary+0xc5e/0x2980 fs/binfmt_elf.c:1029
search_binary_handler fs/exec.c:1664 [inline]
exec_binprm fs/exec.c:1696 [inline]
bprm_execve+0x949/0x1470 fs/exec.c:1748
kernel_execve+0x844/0x930 fs/exec.c:1892
try_to_run_init_process+0x13/0x60 init/main.c:1514
kernel_init+0xad/0x1d0 init/main.c:1642
ret_from_fork+0x51e/0xb90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0xf0/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__might_fault+0xcb/0x130 mm/memory.c:7249
userfaultfd_continue fs/userfaultfd.c:1813 [inline]
userfaultfd_ioctl+0x2372/0x4c70 fs/userfaultfd.c:2071
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:583
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x14d/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock --> vm_lock --> &ctx->map_changing_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
rlock(&ctx->map_changing_lock);
lock(vm_lock);
lock(&ctx->map_changing_lock);
rlock(&mm->mmap_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Fixes: 7d4d4de3ac3e ("userfaultfd: introduce mfill_get_vma() and mfill_put_vma()")
Reported-by: syzbot+c473aa669b5e8a6f48d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c473aa669b5e8a6f48d2
Tested-by: syzbot+c473aa669b5e8a6f48d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
---
mm/userfaultfd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index 9ffc80d0a51b..a3333d5c6454 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ static int mfill_get_vma(struct mfill_state *state)
if (IS_ERR(dst_vma))
return PTR_ERR(dst_vma);
+ state->vma = dst_vma;
/*
* If memory mappings are changing because of non-cooperative
* operation (e.g. mremap) running in parallel, bail out and
@@ -257,7 +258,6 @@ static int mfill_get_vma(struct mfill_state *state)
goto out_unlock;
out:
- state->vma = dst_vma;
return 0;
out_unlock:
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 18:37 [syzbot] [mm?] possible deadlock in mfill_get_vma syzbot
2026-03-16 3:11 ` Edward Adam Davis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_C43C1BB425D6BA16BB6533FC9E001BC64B08@qq.com \
--to=eadavis@qq.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+c473aa669b5e8a6f48d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox