linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] riscv: mm: Use hint address in mmap if available
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:41:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_83E0AB36A9A3032E5A4C4AC864A311DF9406@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130-use_mmap_hint_address-v3-1-8a655cfa8bcb@rivosinc.com>

On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 17:07 -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> On riscv it is guaranteed that the address returned by mmap is less
> than
> the hint address. Allow mmap to return an address all the way up to
> addr, if provided, rather than just up to the lower address space.
> 
> This provides a performance benefit as well, allowing mmap to exit
> after
> checking that the address is in range rather than searching for a
> valid
> address.
> 
> It is possible to provide an address that uses at most the same
> number
> of bits, however it is significantly more computationally expensive
> to
> provide that number rather than setting the max to be the hint
> address.
> There is the instruction clz/clzw in Zbb that returns the highest set
> bit
> which could be used to performantly implement this, but it would
> still
> be slower than the current implementation. At worst case, half of the
> address would not be able to be allocated when a hint address is
> provided.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 27 +++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> index f19f861cda54..8ece7a8f0e18 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -14,22 +14,16 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> -#define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW	(UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1))
> -#define STACK_TOP_MAX		TASK_SIZE_64
> -
>  #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags)			\
>  ({								\
>  	unsigned long
> mmap_end;					\
>  	typeof(addr) _addr = (addr);				\
> -	if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) &&
> is_compat_task())) \
> +	if ((_addr) == 0 ||					\
> +	    (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task()) ||	\
> +	    ((_addr + len) > BIT(VA_BITS -
> 1)))			\
>  		mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX;			\
> -	else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57)			\
> -		mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX;			\
> -	else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >=
> VA_BITS_SV48)) \
> -		mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48;			\
>  	else							\
> -		mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39;			\
> +		mmap_end = (_addr + len);			\
>  	mmap_end;						\
>  })
>  
> @@ -39,17 +33,18 @@
>  	typeof(addr) _addr = (addr);				\
>  	typeof(base) _base = (base);				\
>  	unsigned long rnd_gap = DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW - (_base);	\
> -	if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) &&
> is_compat_task())) \
> +	if ((_addr) == 0 ||					\
> +	    (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task()) ||	\
> +	    ((_addr + len) > BIT(VA_BITS -
> 1)))			\
>  		mmap_base = (_base);				\
> -	else if (((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) && (VA_BITS >=
> VA_BITS_SV57)) \
> -		mmap_base = VA_USER_SV57 - rnd_gap;		\
> -	else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >=
> VA_BITS_SV48)) \
> -		mmap_base = VA_USER_SV48 - rnd_gap;		\
>  	else							\
> -		mmap_base = VA_USER_SV39 - rnd_gap;		\
> +		mmap_base = (_addr + len) - rnd_gap;		\
>  	mmap_base;						\
>  })
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +#define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW	(UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1))
> +#define STACK_TOP_MAX		TASK_SIZE_64
>  #else
>  #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW	TASK_SIZE
>  #define STACK_TOP_MAX		TASK_SIZE
> 

I have carefully tested your patch on qemu with sv57. A bug that needs
to be solved is that mmap with the same hint address without MAP_FIXED
set will fail the second time.

Userspace code to reproduce the bug:

#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>

void test(char *addr) {
    char *res = mmap(addr, 4096, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS
| MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
    printf("hint %p got %p.\n", addr, res);
}

int main (void) {
    test(1<<30);
    test(1<<30);
    test(1<<30);
    return 0;
}

output:

hint 0x40000000 got 0x40000000.
hint 0x40000000 got 0xffffffffffffffff.
hint 0x40000000 got 0xffffffffffffffff.

output on x86:

hint 0x40000000 got 0x40000000.
hint 0x40000000 got 0x7f9171363000.
hint 0x40000000 got 0x7f9171362000.

It may need to implement a special arch_get_unmapped_area and
arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown function.



  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-31  1:06 [PATCH v3 0/3] riscv: mm: Extend mappable memory up to hint address Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-31  1:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] riscv: mm: Use hint address in mmap if available Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-31 14:41   ` Yangyu Chen [this message]
2024-01-31 15:59     ` Yangyu Chen
2024-02-02  2:28       ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-03-22 14:06         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-08-18 15:34           ` Levi Zim
2024-08-19  5:55           ` Levi Zim
2024-08-19 17:00             ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-08-20  1:48               ` Levi Zim
2024-08-20  2:43                 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-08-20  1:58               ` Levi Zim
2024-08-21 22:17                 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-08-22  2:51                   ` Yangyu Chen
2024-08-23  4:39                     ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-08-23  5:28                       ` Yangyu Chen
2024-08-23  5:57                         ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-08-23  6:55                           ` Yangyu Chen
2024-08-26 16:30                             ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-31  1:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] selftests: riscv: Generalize mm selftests Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-31  1:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] docs: riscv: Define behavior of mmap Charlie Jenkins
2024-03-20 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] riscv: mm: Extend mappable memory up to hint address patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tencent_83E0AB36A9A3032E5A4C4AC864A311DF9406@qq.com \
    --to=cyy@cyyself.name \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox