* [PATCH v4] zram: Fix the issue that the write - back limits might overflow
@ 2025-11-19 4:13 Yuwen Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Yuwen Chen @ 2025-11-19 4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, senozhatsky, minchan
Cc: bgeffon, licayy, linux-block, linux-kernel, linux-mm, richardycc,
ywen.chen
When the page size exceeds 4KB, if bd_wb_limit is set to a value
that is not aligned with the page size, it will cause a numerical
wrap-around issue for bd_wb_limit. For example, when the page
size is set to 16KB and bd_wb_limit is set to 3, after one
write-back operation, the value of bd_wb_limit will become -1.
More seriously, since bd_wb_limit is an unsigned number, its
value may become as large as 2^64 - 1.
The core reason for this problem is that the unit of bd_wb_limit
is 4KB. For example, when a write-back occurs on a system with a
page size of 16KB, 4 needs to be subtracted from bd_wb_limit.
This operation takes place in the zram_account_writeback_submit
function.
This patch fixes the issue by limiting bd_wb_limit to be an
integer multiple of PAGE_SIZE / 4096.
Fixes: 1d69a3f8ae77e ("zram: idle writeback fixes and cleanup")
Signed-off-by: Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@foxmail.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Fix the code format issue.
Changes in v3:
- Simplify the code using rounddown.
Changes in v2:
- Rebase the patch to adapt to the latest version.
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 8a13729..fff9e45 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -579,6 +579,16 @@ static ssize_t writeback_limit_store(struct device *dev,
if (kstrtoull(buf, 10, &val))
return ret;
+ /*
+ * When the page size is greater than 4KB, if bd_wb_limit is set to
+ * a value that is not page - size aligned, it will cause value
+ * wrapping. For example, when the page size is set to 16KB and
+ * bd_wb_limit is set to 3, a single write - back operation will
+ * cause bd_wb_limit to become -1. Even more terrifying is that
+ * bd_wb_limit is an unsigned number.
+ */
+ val = rounddown(val, PAGE_SIZE / 4096);
+
down_write(&zram->init_lock);
zram->bd_wb_limit = val;
up_write(&zram->init_lock);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-11-19 4:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-19 4:13 [PATCH v4] zram: Fix the issue that the write - back limits might overflow Yuwen Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox