linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,  Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] mm: Rework compound_head() for power-of-2 sizeof(struct page)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:29:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <t3z3msqpbtnkgwqs5fxvnd4zsymclxzzr6vcaubv7z5jtqd46i@g5vtuktue54s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22609798-e84b-46ca-9cb5-649ffba4a2a4@gmail.com>

On Sat, Dec 06, 2025 at 12:25:12AM +0000, Usama Arif wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/12/2025 19:43, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> > For tail pages, the kernel uses the 'compound_info' field to get to the
> > head page. The bit 0 of the field indicates whether the page is a
> > tail page, and if set, the remaining bits represent a pointer to the
> > head page.
> > 
> > For cases when size of struct page is power-of-2, change the encoding of
> > compound_info to store a mask that can be applied to the virtual address
> > of the tail page in order to access the head page. It is possible
> > because sturct page of the head page is naturally aligned with regards
> 
> nit: s/sturct/struct/

Ack.

> > to order of the page.
> 
> Might be good to add to state here that no change expected if the struct page
> is not a power of 2.

Okay.

> > 
> > The significant impact of this modification is that all tail pages of
> > the same order will now have identical 'compound_info', regardless of
> > the compound page they are associated with. This paves the way for
> > eliminating fake heads.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/page-flags.h | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  mm/util.c                  | 15 +++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > index 11d9499e5ced..eef02fbbb40f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ static __always_inline const struct page *page_fixed_fake_head(const struct page
> >  	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap_key))
> >  		return page;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Fake heads only exists if size of struct page is power-of-2.
> > +	 * See hugetlb_vmemmap_optimizable_size().
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)))
> > +		return page;
> > +
> 
> 
> hmm my understanding reviewing up until this patch of the series is that everything works
> the same as old code when struct page is not a power of 2. Returning page here means you dont
> fix page head when sizeof(struct page) is not a power of 2?

There's no change for non-power-of-2 sizeof(struct page) as there's no
fake heads because there's no HVO for such cases.

See hugetlb_vmemmap_optimizable_size() as I mentioned in the comment.

> 
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Only addresses aligned with PAGE_SIZE of struct page may be fake head
> >  	 * struct page. The alignment check aims to avoid access the fields (
> > @@ -223,10 +230,13 @@ static __always_inline const struct page *page_fixed_fake_head(const struct page
> >  		 * because the @page is a compound page composed with at least
> >  		 * two contiguous pages.
> >  		 */
> > -		unsigned long head = READ_ONCE(page[1].compound_info);
> > +		unsigned long info = READ_ONCE(page[1].compound_info);
> >  
> > -		if (likely(head & 1))
> > -			return (const struct page *)(head - 1);
> > +		if (likely(info & 1)) {
> > +			unsigned long p = (unsigned long)page;
> > +
> > +			return (const struct page *)(p & info);
> 
> Would it be worth writing a comment over here similar to what you have in set_compound_head
> to explain why this works? i.e. compound_info contains the mask derived from folio order that
> can be applied to the virtual address to get the head page.

But this code is about to be deleted. Is it really worth it?

> Also, it takes a few minutes to wrap your head around the fact that this works because the struct
> page of the head page is aligned wrt to the order. Maybe it might be good to add that somewhere as
> a comment somewhere? I dont see it documented in this patch, if its in a future patch, please ignore
> this comment. 

Okay, I will try to explain it better.

> 
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  	return page;
> >  }
> > @@ -281,11 +291,27 @@ static __always_inline int page_is_fake_head(const struct page *page)
> >  
> >  static __always_inline unsigned long _compound_head(const struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long head = READ_ONCE(page->compound_info);
> > +	unsigned long info = READ_ONCE(page->compound_info);
> >  
> > -	if (unlikely(head & 1))
> > -		return head - 1;
> > -	return (unsigned long)page_fixed_fake_head(page);
> > +	/* Bit 0 encodes PageTail() */
> > +	if (!(info & 1))
> > +		return (unsigned long)page_fixed_fake_head(page);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the size of struct page is not power-of-2, the rest if
> 
> nit: s/if/of

Ack.

> 
> > +	 * compound_info is the pointer to the head page.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)))
> > +		return info - 1;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the size of struct page is power-of-2 it is set the rest of
> 
> nit: remove "it is set"

Ack.

> 
> > +	 * the info encodes the mask that converts the address of the tail
> > +	 * page to the head page.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * No need to clear bit 0 in the mask as 'page' always has it clear.
> > +	 */
> > +	return (unsigned long)page & info;
> >  }
> >  
> >  #define compound_head(page)	((typeof(page))_compound_head(page))
> > @@ -294,7 +320,26 @@ static __always_inline void set_compound_head(struct page *page,
> >  					      struct page *head,
> >  					      unsigned int order)
> >  {
> > -	WRITE_ONCE(page->compound_info, (unsigned long)head + 1);
> > +	unsigned int shift;
> > +	unsigned long mask;
> > +
> > +	if (!is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page))) {
> > +		WRITE_ONCE(page->compound_info, (unsigned long)head | 1);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the size of struct page is power-of-2, bits [shift:0] of the
> > +	 * virtual address of compound head are zero.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * Calculate mask that can be applied the virtual address of the
> 
> nit: applied to the ..

Ack.

> 
> > +	 * tail page to get address of the head page.
> > +	 */
> > +	shift = order + order_base_2(sizeof(struct page));
> > +	mask = GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG - 1, shift);
> > +
> > +	/* Bit 0 encodes PageTail() */
> > +	WRITE_ONCE(page->compound_info, mask | 1);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static __always_inline void clear_compound_head(struct page *page)
> > diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> > index cbf93cf3223a..6723d2bb7f1e 100644
> > --- a/mm/util.c
> > +++ b/mm/util.c
> > @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static void set_ps_flags(struct page_snapshot *ps, const struct folio *folio,
> >   */
> >  void snapshot_page(struct page_snapshot *ps, const struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long head, nr_pages = 1;
> > +	unsigned long info, nr_pages = 1;
> >  	struct folio *foliop;
> >  	int loops = 5;
> >  
> > @@ -1244,8 +1244,8 @@ void snapshot_page(struct page_snapshot *ps, const struct page *page)
> >  again:
> >  	memset(&ps->folio_snapshot, 0, sizeof(struct folio));
> >  	memcpy(&ps->page_snapshot, page, sizeof(*page));
> > -	head = ps->page_snapshot.compound_info;
> > -	if ((head & 1) == 0) {
> > +	info = ps->page_snapshot.compound_info;
> > +	if ((info & 1) == 0) {
> >  		ps->idx = 0;
> >  		foliop = (struct folio *)&ps->page_snapshot;
> >  		if (!folio_test_large(foliop)) {
> > @@ -1256,7 +1256,14 @@ void snapshot_page(struct page_snapshot *ps, const struct page *page)
> >  		}
> >  		foliop = (struct folio *)page;
> >  	} else {
> > -		foliop = (struct folio *)(head - 1);
> > +		unsigned long p = (unsigned long)page;
> > +
> > +		/* See compound_head() */
> > +		if (is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)))
> > +			foliop = (struct folio *)(p & info);
> > +		else
> > +			foliop = (struct folio *)(info - 1);
> > +
> 
> Would it be better to do below, as you dont need to than declare p if sizeof(struct page) is not
> a power of 2?
> 
> if (!is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)))
> 	foliop = (struct folio *)(info - 1);
> else {
> 	unsigned long p = (unsigned long)page;
> 	foliop = (struct folio *)(p & info);
> }

Okay.

> 	
> >  		ps->idx = folio_page_idx(foliop, page);
> >  	}
> >  
> 

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-06 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-05 19:43 [PATCH 00/11] mm/hugetlb: Eliminate fake head pages from vmemmap optimization Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: Change the interface of prep_compound_tail() Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 21:49   ` Usama Arif
2025-12-05 22:10     ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 22:15       ` Usama Arif
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm: Rename the 'compound_head' field in the 'struct page' to 'compound_info' Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm: Move set/clear_compound_head() to compound_head() Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm: Rework compound_head() for power-of-2 sizeof(struct page) Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-06  0:25   ` Usama Arif
2025-12-06 16:29     ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2025-12-06 17:36       ` Usama Arif
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm/hugetlb: Refactor code around vmemmap_walk Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-06 16:42   ` Usama Arif
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm/hugetlb: Remove fake head pages Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-06 17:03   ` Usama Arif
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm: Drop fake head checks and fix a race condition Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-06 17:27   ` Usama Arif
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 08/11] hugetlb: Remove VMEMMAP_SYNCHRONIZE_RCU Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm/hugetlb: Remove hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap_key static key Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm: Remove the branch from compound_head() Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 11/11] hugetlb: Update vmemmap_dedup.rst Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 20:16 ` [PATCH 00/11] mm/hugetlb: Eliminate fake head pages from vmemmap optimization David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-05 20:33   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 20:44     ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-05 20:54       ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-05 21:34         ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-05 21:41           ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-06 17:47             ` Usama Arif

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=t3z3msqpbtnkgwqs5fxvnd4zsymclxzzr6vcaubv7z5jtqd46i@g5vtuktue54s \
    --to=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox