From: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
vbabka@suse.cz, harry.yoo@oracle.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix slab accounting in refill_obj_stock() trylock path
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:01:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <siuyozcbi5x6vusawdy3be5buho5y4qilc5uls7rgiihagk7uv@cfrr75gh4bty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e759dd9b-0857-4155-b570-cd002155f123@suse.com>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 02:44:02PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 2/26/26 14:39, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 07:51:37PM +0800, Hao Li wrote:
> >> In the trylock path of refill_obj_stock(), mod_objcg_mlstate() should
> >> use the real alloc/free bytes (i.e., nr_acct) for accounting, rather
> >> than nr_bytes.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 200577f69f29 ("memcg: objcg stock trylock without irq disabling")
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
> >
> > Thanks for the fix.
> >
> > Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
>
> What are the user-visible effects of the bug?
The user-visible impact is that the NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B and
NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B stats can end up being incorrect.
For example, if a user allocates a 6144-byte object, then before this fix
refill_obj_stock() calls mod_objcg_mlstate(..., nr_bytes=2048), even though it
should account for 6144 bytes (i.e., nr_acct).
When the user later frees the same object with kfree(), refill_obj_stock() calls
mod_objcg_mlstate(..., nr_bytes=6144). This ends up adding 6144 to the stats,
but it should be applying -6144 (i.e., nr_acct) since the object is being
freed.
--
Thanks,
Hao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 11:51 Hao Li
2026-02-26 13:39 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-26 13:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-27 1:01 ` Hao Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=siuyozcbi5x6vusawdy3be5buho5y4qilc5uls7rgiihagk7uv@cfrr75gh4bty \
--to=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox