From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in generic/749 with 8k fsblock size on 6.18-rc1
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:59:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rymlydtl4fo4k4okciiifsl52vnd7pqs65me6grweotgsxagln@zebgjfr3tuep> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014175214.GW6188@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 10:52:14AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On 6.18-rc1, generic/749[1] running on XFS with an 8k fsblock size fails
> with the following:
>
> --- /run/fstests/bin/tests/generic/749.out 2025-07-15 14:45:15.170416031 -0700
> +++ /var/tmp/fstests/generic/749.out.bad 2025-10-13 17:48:53.079872054 -0700
> @@ -1,2 +1,10 @@
> QA output created by 749
> +Expected SIGBUS when mmap() reading beyond page boundary
> +Expected SIGBUS when mmap() writing beyond page boundary
> +Expected SIGBUS when mmap() reading beyond page boundary
> +Expected SIGBUS when mmap() writing beyond page boundary
> +Expected SIGBUS when mmap() reading beyond page boundary
> +Expected SIGBUS when mmap() writing beyond page boundary
> +Expected SIGBUS when mmap() reading beyond page boundary
> +Expected SIGBUS when mmap() writing beyond page boundary
> Silence is golden
>
> This test creates small files of various sizes, maps the EOF block, and
> checks that you can read and write to the mmap'd page up to (but not
> beyond) the next page boundary.
>
> For 8k fsblock filesystems on x86, the pagecache creates a single 8k
> folio to cache the entire fsblock containing EOF. If EOF is in the
> first 4096 bytes of that 8k fsblock, then it should be possible to do a
> mmap read/write of the first 4k, but not the second 4k. Memory accesses
> to the second 4096 bytes should produce a SIGBUS.
Does anybody actually relies on this behaviour (beyond xfstests)?
I think this behaviour existed before the recent changes, but it was
less prominent.
Like, tmpfs with huge=always would fault-in PMD if there's order-9 folio
in page cache regardless of i_size.
See filemap_map_pages->filemap_map_pmd() path.
I believe the same happens for large folios in other filesystems.
Some of this behaviour is hidden by truncate path trying to split large
folios, split PMD and unmap a range of PTEs. But split can fail, so we
cannot rely on this for correctness.
I would like to understand more about expectations in real workload
before commit to a fix.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 17:52 Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-15 7:39 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-10-15 17:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-15 15:59 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2025-10-15 17:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-16 10:22 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-10-16 22:33 ` Dave Chinner
2025-10-17 14:28 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-10-17 16:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 17:00 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-10-17 17:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-10-21 17:02 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rymlydtl4fo4k4okciiifsl52vnd7pqs65me6grweotgsxagln@zebgjfr3tuep \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox