linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,  djwong@kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, jack@suse.com
Subject: Re: O_DIRECT vs BLK_FEAT_STABLE_WRITES, was Re: [PATCH] btrfs: never trust the bio from direct IO
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 11:33:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <rizci7wwm7ncrc6uf7ibtiap52rqghe7rt6ecrcoyp22otqwu4@bqksgiaxlc5v> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32a9b501-742d-4954-9207-bb7d0c08fccb@redhat.com>

On Tue 21-10-25 09:57:08, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 21.10.25 09:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 09:00:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > Just FYI, because it might be interesting in this context.
> > > 
> > > For anonymous memory we have this working by only writing the folio out if
> > > it is completely unmapped and there are no unexpected folio references/pins
> > > (see pageout()), and only allowing to write to such a folio ("reuse") if
> > > SWP_STABLE_WRITES is not set (see do_swap_page()).
> > > 
> > > So once we start writeback the folio has no writable page table mappings
> > > (unmapped) and no GUP pins. Consequently, when trying to write to it we can
> > > just fallback to creating a page copy without causing trouble with GUP pins.
> > 
> > Yeah.  But anonymous is the easy case, the pain is direct I/O to file
> > mappings.  Mapping the right answer is to just fail pinning them and fall
> > back to (dontcache) buffered I/O.
> 
> Right, I think the rules could likely be
> 
> a) Don't start writeback to such devices if there may be GUP pins (o
> writeble PTEs)
> 
> b) Don't allow FOLL_WRITE GUP pins if there is writeback to such a device
> 
> Regarding b), I would have thought that GUP would find the PTE to not be
> writable and consequently trigger a page fault first to make it writable?
> And I'd have thought that we cannot make such a PTE writable while there is
> writeback to such a device going on (otherwise the CPU could just cause
> trouble).

See some of the cases in my reply to Christoph. It is also stuff like:

c) Don't allow FOLL_WRITE GUP pins or writeable mapping if there are *any*
pins to the page.

And we'd have to write-protect the page in the page tables at the moment we
obtain the FOLL_WRITE GUP pin to make sure the pin owner is the only thread
able to modify that page contents while the DIO is running.

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-21  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1ee861df6fbd8bf45ab42154f429a31819294352.1760951886.git.wqu@suse.com>
2025-10-20 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 10:24   ` Qu Wenruo
2025-10-20 11:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 11:16   ` Jan Kara
2025-10-20 11:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 13:59       ` Jan Kara
2025-10-20 14:59         ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-10-20 15:58           ` Jan Kara
2025-10-20 17:55             ` John Hubbard
2025-10-21  8:27               ` Jan Kara
2025-10-21 16:56                 ` John Hubbard
2025-10-20 19:00             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21  7:49               ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-21  7:57                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21  9:33                   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2025-10-21  9:43                     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21  9:22                 ` Jan Kara
2025-10-21  9:37                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-21  9:52                     ` Jan Kara
2025-10-21  3:17   ` Qu Wenruo
2025-10-21  7:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-21  8:15       ` Qu Wenruo
2025-10-21 11:30         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-10-22  2:27           ` Qu Wenruo
2025-10-22  5:04             ` hch
2025-10-22  6:17               ` Qu Wenruo
2025-10-22  6:24                 ` hch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=rizci7wwm7ncrc6uf7ibtiap52rqghe7rt6ecrcoyp22otqwu4@bqksgiaxlc5v \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox