linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	 Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: multi-memcg percpu charge cache
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:43:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <qt5jtbsgjym655tbnoddlo5c7cemndcgsqwy4wp7m7ki3venxz@cfp637s7eqo6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBDCXB_Tb2Iaihua@tiehlicka>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 02:13:16PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > Some of the design choices are:
> > 
> > 1. Fit all caches memcgs in a single cacheline.
> 
> Could you be more specific about the reasoning? I suspect it is for the
> network receive path you are mentioning above, right?
> 

Here I meant why I chose NR_MEMCG_STOCK to be 7. Basically the first
cacheline of per-cpu stock has all the cached memcg, so checking if a
given memcg is cached or not should be comparable cheap as single cached
memcg. You suggested comment already mentioned this.

However please note that we may find in future that 2 cachelines worth of
cached memcgs are better for wider audience/workloads but for simplicity
let's start with single cacheline worth of cached memcgs.

[...]
> 
> Just a minor suggestion below. Other than that looks good to me (with
> follow up fixes) in this thread.
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Thanks!
> 

Thanks, I will send a diff for Andrew to squash it into original patch.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-29 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16 18:02 Shakeel Butt
2025-04-23  1:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-23 22:16   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-23 22:30     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-23 22:59       ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-23 23:14 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-25 20:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-29  9:40   ` Hugh Dickins
2025-04-29 14:50     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-30 10:05   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-30 15:16     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-29 12:13 ` Michal Hocko
2025-04-29 18:43   ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-04-30  6:48     ` Michal Hocko
2025-04-30  9:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-30 15:05   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-30 15:32 ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=qt5jtbsgjym655tbnoddlo5c7cemndcgsqwy4wp7m7ki3venxz@cfp637s7eqo6 \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox