From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: multi-memcg percpu charge cache
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:43:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qt5jtbsgjym655tbnoddlo5c7cemndcgsqwy4wp7m7ki3venxz@cfp637s7eqo6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBDCXB_Tb2Iaihua@tiehlicka>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 02:13:16PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > Some of the design choices are:
> >
> > 1. Fit all caches memcgs in a single cacheline.
>
> Could you be more specific about the reasoning? I suspect it is for the
> network receive path you are mentioning above, right?
>
Here I meant why I chose NR_MEMCG_STOCK to be 7. Basically the first
cacheline of per-cpu stock has all the cached memcg, so checking if a
given memcg is cached or not should be comparable cheap as single cached
memcg. You suggested comment already mentioned this.
However please note that we may find in future that 2 cachelines worth of
cached memcgs are better for wider audience/workloads but for simplicity
let's start with single cacheline worth of cached memcgs.
[...]
>
> Just a minor suggestion below. Other than that looks good to me (with
> follow up fixes) in this thread.
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Thanks!
>
Thanks, I will send a diff for Andrew to squash it into original patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 18:02 Shakeel Butt
2025-04-23 1:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-23 22:16 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-23 22:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-23 22:59 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-23 23:14 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-25 20:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-29 9:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2025-04-29 14:50 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-30 10:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-30 15:16 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-29 12:13 ` Michal Hocko
2025-04-29 18:43 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-04-30 6:48 ` Michal Hocko
2025-04-30 9:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-30 15:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-04-30 15:32 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=qt5jtbsgjym655tbnoddlo5c7cemndcgsqwy4wp7m7ki3venxz@cfp637s7eqo6 \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox