linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
	 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] zsmalloc: make common caches global
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:19:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <qs7qfzsldjz4fd3lozlm72p2vmebzxvsxos76r2h4gvjc555un@3mfigywcnenv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKEwX=PxJo6RijehmJMz+kK45Qr9AcQMCedO7KY_+GWzsW20tQ@mail.gmail.com>

On (26/01/19 13:43), Nhat Pham wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 8:49 PM Sergey Senozhatsky
> <senozhatsky@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, zsmalloc creates kmem_cache of handles and zspages
> > for each pool, which may be suboptimal from the memory usage
> > point of view (extra internal fragmentation per pool).  Systems
> > that create multiple zsmalloc pools may benefit from shared
> > common zsmalloc caches.
> >
> > Make handles and zspages kmem caches global.
> 
> Hmm yeah this sounds reasonable to me. No reason to have dedicated
> kmem_cache per zs_pool (in the case of zswap, I suppose it's one for
> each compression algorithm, which is usually just one - but still...).
> 
> Is there any lock contention implications?

cache_alloc_handle()/cache_alloc_zspage() (and their free counterparts)
are called outside of scope of any zsmalloc locks, so the upper boundary
on the number of concurrent callers is the same - num_online_cpus().


      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-20  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-16  4:48 Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-01-16  5:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-01-19 21:44   ` Nhat Pham
2026-01-21  3:41     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-01-21 23:58       ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-01-22  3:28         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-01-22  3:39           ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-01-22  3:55             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-01-16 20:49 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-01-17  2:24   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-01-21  1:30     ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-01-21  1:56       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-01-19 21:43 ` Nhat Pham
2026-01-20  1:19   ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=qs7qfzsldjz4fd3lozlm72p2vmebzxvsxos76r2h4gvjc555un@3mfigywcnenv \
    --to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bgeffon@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox