linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: "Pratik R. Sampat" <prsampat@amd.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	 mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	ardb@kernel.org,  akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
	osalvador@suse.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	 michael.roth@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] efi/libstub: Decouple memory bitmap from the unaccepted table
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:08:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <phywn74ghpsqncoqsgdqjoxeqdxskibzt3yltn6bmtc25sm46g@emad5n6wp5l2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251125175753.1428857-2-prsampat@amd.com>

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:57:50AM -0600, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
> Memory hotplug in secure environments requires the unaccepted memory
> bitmap to grow as new memory is added. Currently, the bitmap is
> implemented as a flexible array member at the end of struct
> efi_unaccepted_memory, which is reserved by memblock at boot and cannot
> be resized without reallocating the entire structure.
> 
> Replace the flexible array member with a pointer.

Well, it break interoperability between kernel before and after the
patch. Consider kexec from kernel without the patch to the kernel with
the patch and then back to older kernel. It is ABI break.

Is re-allocating the entire structure such a big pain?

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-26 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-25 17:57 [RFC PATCH 0/4] SEV-SNP Unaccepted Memory Hotplug Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-25 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] efi/libstub: Decouple memory bitmap from the unaccepted table Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-26 11:08   ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2025-11-26 22:27     ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-27 17:29       ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-25 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory hotplug Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-26 11:12   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-26 22:27     ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-27 17:40       ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-28  9:34         ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 17:15           ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-12-01 18:25             ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 19:35               ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-12-01 17:15         ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-12-01 17:48           ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-01 17:58             ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-26 22:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-27 17:35       ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-27 18:12         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-28  9:30           ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-28 11:34             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-01  9:18               ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 11:12                 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-01 18:32                   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 19:10                     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-01 20:10                       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 20:25                         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-01 20:36                           ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-03 14:46                             ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-03 15:58                               ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-03 15:00             ` Rik van Riel
2025-11-28  9:32   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 17:21     ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-12-01 18:36       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 19:35         ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-25 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/sev: Introduce hotplug-aware SNP page state validation Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-25 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory hot-remove Pratik R. Sampat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=phywn74ghpsqncoqsgdqjoxeqdxskibzt3yltn6bmtc25sm46g@emad5n6wp5l2 \
    --to=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=prsampat@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox