From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com,
werner@almesberger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code
Date: 16 Nov 2005 08:48:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73sltxowx4.fsf@verdi.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec7e5c30511152122w70703fbfl98bd377fb6fb9af4@mail.gmail.com>
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> writes:
>
> For testing, your NUMA emulation code is perfect IMO. But for memory
> resource control your NUMA emulation code may be too simple.
>
> With my patch, CONFIG_NUMA_EMU provides a way to partition a machine
> into several smaller nodes, regardless if the machine is using NUMA or
> not.
>
> This NUMA emulation code together with CPUSETS could be seen as a
> simple alternative to the memory resource control provided by CKRM.
I believe Werner tried to use it at some point for that and it just
didn't work very well. So it doesn't seem to be very useful for
that usecase.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-10 9:08 [PATCH 00/05][RFC] NUMA emulation update Magnus Damm
2005-11-10 9:08 ` [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code Magnus Damm
2005-11-11 4:16 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-15 8:34 ` Magnus Damm
2005-11-15 14:15 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-16 5:22 ` Magnus Damm
2005-11-16 7:48 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-11-16 7:57 ` Magnus Damm
2005-11-16 8:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-16 11:31 ` Werner Almesberger
2005-11-10 9:08 ` [PATCH 02/05] x86_64: NUMA cleanup Magnus Damm
2005-11-10 9:08 ` [PATCH 03/05] x86_64: NUMA emulation Magnus Damm
2005-11-10 9:08 ` [PATCH 04/05] x86_64: NUMA without SMP Magnus Damm
2005-11-10 9:08 ` [PATCH 05/05] NUMA: find_next_best_node fix Magnus Damm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p73sltxowx4.fsf@verdi.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=werner@almesberger.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox