From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, lance.yang@linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests: cgroup: make test_memcg_sock robust against delayed sock stats
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:35:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p655qedqjaakrnqpytc6dltejfluxo6jrffcltfz2ivonmk6lb@bxf5xlgo4iw2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120060406.2846257-1-zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4553 bytes --]
Hello Guopeng.
+Cc Leon Huang Fu <leon.huangfu@shopee.com>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 02:04:06PM +0800, Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn> wrote:
> test_memcg_sock() currently requires that memory.stat's "sock " counter
> is exactly zero immediately after the TCP server exits. On a busy system
> this assumption is too strict:
>
> - Socket memory may be freed with a small delay (e.g. RCU callbacks).
(FTR, I remember there is `echo 1 > /sys/module/rcutree/parameters/do_rcu_barrier`,
however, I'm not sure it works always as expected (a reader may actually
wait for multi-stage RCU pipeline), so plain timeout is more reliable.)
> - memcg statistics are updated asynchronously via the rstat flushing
> worker, so the "sock " value in memory.stat can stay non-zero for a
> short period of time even after all socket memory has been uncharged.
>
> As a result, test_memcg_sock() can intermittently fail even though socket
> memory accounting is working correctly.
>
> Make the test more robust by polling memory.stat for the "sock "
> counter and allowing it some time to drop to zero instead of checking
> it only once.
I like the approach of adaptive waiting to settle in such tests.
> The timeout is set to 3 seconds to cover the periodic rstat flush
> interval (FLUSH_TIME = 2*HZ by default) plus some scheduling slack. If
> the counter does not become zero within the timeout, the test still
> fails as before.
>
> On my test system, running test_memcontrol 50 times produced:
>
> - Before this patch: 6/50 runs passed.
> - After this patch: 50/50 runs passed.
BTW Have you looked into the number of retries until success?
Was it in accordance with the flushing interval?
>
> Suggested-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> v3:
> - Move MEMCG_SOCKSTAT_WAIT_* defines after the #include block as
> suggested.
> v2:
> - Mention the periodic rstat flush interval (FLUSH_TIME = 2*HZ) in
> the comment and clarify the rationale for the 3s timeout.
> - Replace the hard-coded retry count and wait interval with macros
> to avoid magic numbers and make the 3s timeout calculation explicit.
> ---
> .../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
> index 4e1647568c5b..8ff7286fc80b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
> #include "kselftest.h"
> #include "cgroup_util.h"
>
> +#define MEMCG_SOCKSTAT_WAIT_RETRIES 30 /* 3s total */
> +#define MEMCG_SOCKSTAT_WAIT_INTERVAL_US (100 * 1000) /* 100 ms */
> +
> static bool has_localevents;
> static bool has_recursiveprot;
>
> @@ -1384,6 +1387,8 @@ static int test_memcg_sock(const char *root)
> int bind_retries = 5, ret = KSFT_FAIL, pid, err;
> unsigned short port;
> char *memcg;
> + long sock_post = -1;
> + int i;
>
> memcg = cg_name(root, "memcg_test");
> if (!memcg)
> @@ -1432,7 +1437,30 @@ static int test_memcg_sock(const char *root)
> if (cg_read_long(memcg, "memory.current") < 0)
> goto cleanup;
>
> - if (cg_read_key_long(memcg, "memory.stat", "sock "))
> + /*
> + * memory.stat is updated asynchronously via the memcg rstat
> + * flushing worker, which runs periodically (every 2 seconds,
> + * see FLUSH_TIME). On a busy system, the "sock " counter may
> + * stay non-zero for a short period of time after the TCP
> + * connection is closed and all socket memory has been
> + * uncharged.
> + *
> + * Poll memory.stat for up to 3 seconds (~FLUSH_TIME plus some
> + * scheduling slack) and require that the "sock " counter
> + * eventually drops to zero.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < MEMCG_SOCKSTAT_WAIT_RETRIES; i++) {
> + sock_post = cg_read_key_long(memcg, "memory.stat", "sock ");
> + if (sock_post < 0)
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + if (!sock_post)
> + break;
> +
> + usleep(MEMCG_SOCKSTAT_WAIT_INTERVAL_US);
> + }
I think this may be useful also for othe tests (at least other
memory.stat checks), so some encapsulated implementation like a macro
with parameters
cg_read_assert_gt_with_retries(cg, file, field, exp, timeout, retries)
WDYT?
Michal
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 265 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 6:04 Guopeng Zhang
2025-11-20 15:35 ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2025-11-21 7:47 ` Guopeng Zhang
2025-12-03 11:59 ` Guopeng Zhang
2025-12-04 15:07 ` Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p655qedqjaakrnqpytc6dltejfluxo6jrffcltfz2ivonmk6lb@bxf5xlgo4iw2 \
--to=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox