From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] maple_tree: use the correct min to calculate split
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 18:00:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p3naprv2xekqie674sdadfnrfisohocnyfie46hpvbmn4sez52@vli2wdnytdym> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241020024628.22469-4-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241019 22:46]:
> The check in mab_calc_split() is to make sure the gap between
> [0, split] won't be too small. But we don't pass the correct min.
>
> First we may encounter a pivot[split] smaller than min. For example:
>
> mt_init_flags(mt, 0);
> for (count = 0; count <= 240; count++) {
> mas_set(&mas, count);
> mas_store(&mas, xa_mk_value(count));
> }
>
> On splitting root for storing 240, the pivot[split] is smaller than min.
> This result a huge (pivot[split] - min).
This is fine.
There is an open work item to make it more accurate at higher levels,
but it's not a problem as it is.
Each level upwards needs a better 'minimum span', meaning that the node
should have at least mas.min - mas.min + level * something.
It works today for leaves, somewhat.
>
> Second prev_l_mas.min is not initialized for the first iteration. This
> means on splitting leaf node, this value is mostly taking no effect.
No, it is set to 0. Not initialized would cause random data loss.
See MA_STATE() in the header.
>
> Since we are now calculating the split of mas->node, we should use the
> mas->min instead of prev_l_mas.min.
This sounds reasonable, but considering what this number is used for, I
don't see how it is working as well as it is today. I will need to look
deeper into this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index 894dc5e9436e..c2d4b188646c 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ static void mas_split(struct ma_state *mas, struct maple_big_node *b_node)
> if (mas_push_data(mas, height, &mast, false))
> break;
>
> - split = mab_calc_split(mas, b_node, &mid_split, prev_l_mas.min);
> + split = mab_calc_split(mas, b_node, &mid_split, mas->min);
> mast_split_data(&mast, mas, split);
> /*
> * Usually correct, mab_mas_cp in the above call overwrites
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-20 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-20 2:46 [PATCH 0/4] maple_tree: current split may result in deficient node Wei Yang
2024-10-20 2:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Wei Yang
2024-10-20 21:55 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-11-03 23:47 ` Wei Yang
2024-11-08 2:30 ` Wei Yang
2024-11-08 2:49 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-20 2:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] maple_tree: add a test check " Wei Yang
2024-10-20 2:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] maple_tree: use the correct min to calculate split Wei Yang
2024-10-20 22:00 ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
2024-10-29 17:49 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-11-08 3:02 ` Wei Yang
2024-11-09 1:24 ` Wei Yang
2024-11-08 2:55 ` Wei Yang
2024-11-08 3:19 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-11-09 1:40 ` Wei Yang
2024-11-09 4:01 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-11-09 12:22 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-20 2:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] maple_tree: only root node could be deficient Wei Yang
2024-10-20 21:56 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-11-03 23:15 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] maple_tree: current split may result in deficient node Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-21 1:30 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p3naprv2xekqie674sdadfnrfisohocnyfie46hpvbmn4sez52@vli2wdnytdym \
--to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=maple-tree@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox