linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com,
	 akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	bigeasy@linutronix.de,  rostedt@goodmis.org, houtao1@huawei.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,  mhocko@suse.com,
	willy@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jannh@google.com,
	 tj@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce localtry_lock_t
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:44:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <oswrb2f2mx36l6f624hqjvx4lkjdi26xwfwux2wi2mlzmdmmf2@dpaodu372ldv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250222024427.30294-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 06:44:22PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> +#define __localtry_lock(lock)					\
> +	do {							\
> +		localtry_lock_t *lt;				\
> +		preempt_disable();				\
> +		lt = this_cpu_ptr(lock);			\
> +		local_lock_acquire(&lt->llock);			\
> +		WRITE_ONCE(lt->acquired, 1);			\
> +	} while (0)

I think these need compiler barriers.

I checked with gcc docs (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Volatiles.html)
and found this as confirmation:
> Accesses to non-volatile objects are not ordered with respect to volatile accesses.

Unless the Linux kernel is built with some magic to render this moot(?).


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-11 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-22  2:44 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/6] bpf, mm: Introduce try_alloc_pages() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-22  2:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce localtry_lock_t Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-11 15:44   ` Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2025-03-11 16:20     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-11 16:31       ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-11 20:21         ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-11 22:24           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-12  8:29             ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14 21:05               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-14 21:08                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-14 21:18                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-22  2:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/6] mm, bpf: Introduce try_alloc_pages() for opportunistic page allocation Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-11  2:04   ` Andrew Morton
2025-03-11 13:32     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-11 18:04       ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-12  9:45         ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-15  0:34         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-12 10:00       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-12 19:06         ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-13  8:44           ` Michal Hocko
2025-03-13 14:21             ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-13 16:02               ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-14 10:16               ` Michal Hocko
2025-03-15  0:51         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-22  2:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/6] mm, bpf: Introduce free_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-22  2:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/6] memcg: Use trylock to access memcg stock_lock Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-22  2:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/6] mm, bpf: Use memcg in try_alloc_pages() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-22  2:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/6] bpf: Use try_alloc_pages() to allocate pages for bpf needs Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-26  3:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/6] bpf, mm: Introduce try_alloc_pages() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-27 17:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=oswrb2f2mx36l6f624hqjvx4lkjdi26xwfwux2wi2mlzmdmmf2@dpaodu372ldv \
    --to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox