From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6328B6B024D for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:42:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from eu_spt2 (mailout1.w1.samsung.com [210.118.77.11]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0L5X00JH6DIDH3@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for linux-mm@kvack.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:42:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from linux.samsung.com ([106.116.38.10]) by spt2.w1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0L5X00EAFDICR1@spt2.w1.samsung.com> for linux-mm@kvack.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:42:13 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:43:37 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBOYXphcmV3aWN6?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: cma: Contiguous Memory Allocator added In-reply-to: <1279744472.31376.42.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-Printable References: <1279649724.26765.23.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1279654698.26765.31.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1279733750.31376.14.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1279736348.31376.20.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1279738688.31376.24.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1279741029.31376.33.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1279742604.31376.40.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1279744472.31376.42.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Daniel Walker Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Marek Szyprowski , Pawel Osciak , Xiaolin Zhang , Hiremath Vaibhav , Robert Fekete , Marcus Lorentzon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Micha=C5=82 Nazarewicz wrote: >> Right..... Please show me a place where I've written that it won't b= e in >> the kernel? I keep repeating command line is only one of the possibil= ities. >> I would imagine that in final product defaults from platform would be= used >> and bootloader would be left alone. On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:34:32 +0200, Daniel Walker wrote: > It should never be anyplace else. I disagree. There are countless =E2=80=9Cdubug_level=E2=80=9D kernel pa= rameters or even some =E2=80=9Cprintk=E2=80=9D related parameters. Those are completely = hardware-independent. There are also parameters that are hardware dependent but most users won= 't care to set them. That's how the things are: there are some defaults bu= t you can override them by command line parameters. -- = Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=3D./ `o | Computer Science, Micha=C5=82 "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org