From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8573C4167B for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 16:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 37FAE8D00C7; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 12:59:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 32F9C8D000C; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 12:59:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1F7908D00C7; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 12:59:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2D08D000C for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 12:59:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FDCB657E for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 16:59:04 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81417253008.09.C8BC35A Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08418160013 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 16:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=tFRHMHyI; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1699030743; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=uksxNlyaCkPKE2rCxUqHpdRT6fah3eDwts+mbY5jJ80=; b=BgWqlhCQjEoFT5XOO9jRjt4Aly+7U4QU2K08F3rkLUHuAov8RyGdLeWjqx091xCIA/yhZl zhx6uaU+rRaEal/+yOrpKzbD5IV6hj4uA5sK8WktXugmwzsNOgaGZoGdnGmSvdf+hoity5 ydxOdTFzX0dnlaY0WAacbVb5fMnZdUI= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1699030743; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=eoQTbOvep9r6Es7nVj4a+Yo5uLbuZdKnkhcWhX7ESE5eHL6PdfnHglGxFYlBRzq749ra6H VlkjJibClKqD5XeHY64XqR96AOmonyEVtw/YvAaK40/attFB0OBPwqGk7xD+XRtHmbqOJ1 qV5tgZTaEAH/ZhiysTbESojUCVPNBqo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=tFRHMHyI; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3027215EF; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 16:59:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1699030740; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uksxNlyaCkPKE2rCxUqHpdRT6fah3eDwts+mbY5jJ80=; b=tFRHMHyImjbSl76qgnGYfaGAQjIf2+RKyoSrDKE6JYpTj3dCCULp5IbO+HPk9WXCt3fUCF Tma8lM/OV+12rR+rWRNAoHDmvTAo+dQyglzQIRQYyylAI0I5KBZMBZ+4gjZCW/UncW3qeC +/gos/UZoYDWbzoJMfms4apKWMlAb2g= Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBAFB13907; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 16:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id W9LcKtQmRWVuVgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 03 Nov 2023 16:59:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 17:59:00 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Gregory Price Cc: Johannes Weiner , Gregory Price , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ying.huang@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, weixugc@google.com, apopple@nvidia.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, shy828301@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Node Weights and Weighted Interleave Message-ID: References: <20231031152142.GA3029315@cmpxchg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 08418160013 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: 1aay5f4qyxdjcteixoz6oz36bhh74nrb X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-HE-Tag: 1699030742-460001 X-HE-Meta: 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 Eaf9N0nf ZPZIXxSv8Ce4zoe76jTpz8nSlU02ZanRAXBLZP3gZIxHRscYp775Om3XOE2GNp9LhbyO61ea0cM6NxP7NeYnB13dq5sCEIr98jI3ngd9pLpfKD3cLpBcABiD31DHOBVMf/5Io5J/N/EoS6zdacVdMfPYFJAcGhLBqse4qDKg5kBSF/Nyo7PiJMcnVP2G0IRBbQqKAtb+ugSo1tod4y8A8m2YTGyYvnh4Ly5lZE0t6cNXpPVALAe+TcZK5pDB6S5/ovl3t X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu 02-11-23 14:21:14, Gregory Price wrote: [...] > Only thing I'm not sure of is what happens if mempolicy is allowed to > select a node that doesn't exist. I could hack up a contrived test, but > i don't think the state is reachable at the moment. There are two different kinds of doesn't exist. One is an offline node and the other is one with a number higher than the config option allows. Although we do have a concept of possible nodes N_POSSIBLE I do not think we do enforce that in any user interface and we only reject nodes outside of MAX_NODE. The possible nodes concept is more about optimizing for real HW so that we do not over shoot when the config allows a huge number of nodes while only handful of them are actually used (which is the majority of cases). -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs