linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] memcg-v1: remove memcg move locking code
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 12:38:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ocwpveyzmog7kaetvfmihzyrxlw5drz647jcsjcziv2gmejyyj@vksg3ntjea2g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxqXyQb1nT6DWPN_@google.com>

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:54:01PM GMT, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:23:49AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 11:16:52AM GMT, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 23-10-24 23:57:12, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > > The memcg v1's charge move feature has been deprecated. There is no need
> > > > to have any locking or protection against the moving charge. Let's
> > > > proceed to remove all the locking code related to charge moving.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> > > > ---
> > > > -/**
> > > > - * folio_memcg_lock - Bind a folio to its memcg.
> > > > - * @folio: The folio.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * This function prevents unlocked LRU folios from being moved to
> > > > - * another cgroup.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * It ensures lifetime of the bound memcg.  The caller is responsible
> > > > - * for the lifetime of the folio.
> > > > - */
> > > > -void folio_memcg_lock(struct folio *folio)
> > > > -{
> > > > -	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > > > -	unsigned long flags;
> > > > -
> > > > -	/*
> > > > -	 * The RCU lock is held throughout the transaction.  The fast
> > > > -	 * path can get away without acquiring the memcg->move_lock
> > > > -	 * because page moving starts with an RCU grace period.
> > > > -         */
> > > > -	rcu_read_lock();
> > > 
> > > Is it safe to remove the implicit RCU?
> > 
> > Good question. I think it will be safe to keep the RCU in this patch and
> > in the followup examine each place and decide to remove RCU or not.
> 
> I took a really quick look and based on it I believe it is safe.
> Shakeel, can you, please, check too and preferably keep your code intact.
> I think it's better to remove it all together, rather than do it in two steps.
> If we really need rcu somewhere, we can replace folio_memcg_lock()/unlock()
> with an explicit rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock().
> 

Yup going through that and till now it seems safe. Hopefully I will have
the update by the evening.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-24 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-25  1:22 [PATCH v1 0/6] memcg-v1: fully deprecate charge moving Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24  6:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] " Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24  6:57   ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] memcg-v1: fully deprecate move_charge_at_immigrate Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24  9:14     ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-24 16:51       ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-24 17:16         ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24 16:49     ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-24  6:57   ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] memcg-v1: remove charge move code Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24  9:14     ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-24 16:50     ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-24  6:57   ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] memcg-v1: remove memcg move locking code Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24  9:16     ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-24 17:23       ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24 18:54         ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-24 19:38           ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2024-10-24 16:50     ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-24 17:26       ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24 19:45         ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-24 20:32           ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-10-24 21:08             ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-25  1:23     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-25  1:22 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] memcg-v1: fully deprecate move_charge_at_immigrate Shakeel Butt
2024-10-25  6:54   ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-28 13:53   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-10-25  1:22 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] memcg-v1: remove charge move code Shakeel Butt
2024-10-28 10:22   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 10:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 13:54   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-10-25  1:23 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] memcg-v1: no need for memcg locking for dirty tracking Shakeel Butt
2024-10-25  6:56   ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-25 16:22     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-25 17:40   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-28 14:00   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-10-25  1:23 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] memcg-v1: no need for memcg locking for writeback tracking Shakeel Butt
2024-10-25  6:57   ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-25 17:40   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-28 14:00   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-10-25  1:23 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] memcg-v1: no need for memcg locking for MGLRU Shakeel Butt
2024-10-25 17:41   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-26  3:55   ` Yu Zhao
2024-10-26  6:20     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-26  6:34   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-26 15:26     ` Yu Zhao
2024-11-04 17:30       ` Yu Zhao
2024-11-04 21:38         ` Andrew Morton
2024-11-04 22:04           ` Shakeel Butt
2024-11-04 22:04           ` Yu Zhao
2024-11-04 22:08             ` Yu Zhao
2024-11-04 22:18               ` Andrew Morton
2024-10-25  1:23 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] memcg-v1: remove memcg move locking code Shakeel Butt
2024-10-25  6:59   ` Michal Hocko
2024-10-25 17:42   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-10-26  3:58   ` Yu Zhao
2024-10-26  6:26     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-28 14:02   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-10-25  1:33 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] memcg-v1: fully deprecate charge moving Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ocwpveyzmog7kaetvfmihzyrxlw5drz647jcsjcziv2gmejyyj@vksg3ntjea2g \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox